Robinhood’s startup fund stumbles in NYSE debut


Retail investors are famously locked out of the startup world. Robinhood is attempting to change that by allowing the general public to invest in a portfolio of what it calls “some of the most exciting private companies operating today.”

To do this, the company that pioneered the commission-free brokerage model has secured access to eight startups—including Databricks, Stripe, Mercor, and Oura—grouping them into a vehicle called Robinhood Ventures Fund I. The fund, which also includes Ramp, Airwallex, Revolut, and Boom, set out last month with an ambitious $1 billion target, but demand for this novel way of investing in private companies was lower than expected.

On Thursday, Robinhood announced the fund had raised $658.4 million — which could reach $705.7 million if underwriters exercise their full allotment. The shares, priced at $25 in the offering, began trading on Friday and closed the day at $21, a 16% decline.

RVI’s reception on Wall Street stands in stark contrast to another attempt to give individual investors exposure to buzzy startups. When Destiny Tech100 — a publicly traded, closed-end fund holding stakes in 100 venture-backed companies including SpaceX, OpenAI, and Discord — direct-listed on the NYSE in March 2024, its shares surged from a reference price of $4.84 to an opening trade of $8.25, eventually closing its first day at $9.00.

Destiny Tech100 has kept climbing since its public debut. The fund closed trading on Friday at $26.61, a 33% premium to its net asset value of $19.97, meaning its shares trade well above the actual value of its underlying holdings.

So what explains why retail investors aren’t nearly as excited about Robinhood’s fund as they are about Destiny Tech 100? The most likely explanation is RVI’s lack of exposure to the companies widely expected to go public at enormous valuations: OpenAI, Anthropic, and SpaceX.

Robinhood is looking to address this. RVI intends to add more startups to the fund, eventually aiming to hold what Robinhood Ventures President Sarah Pinto described to TechCrunch as “15 to 20 of the best late-stage growth companies out there.”  The company’s CFO, Shiv Verma, told Axios Pro on Friday that Robinhood is eyeing exposure to OpenAI.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026

But securing access to these high-profile companies is far from straightforward. Robinhood is aiming to get directly onto their cap tables directly through primary capital raises or secondary share sales — and that’s difficult even for a firm with deep roots in Silicon Valley.

A cap table — the official record of who owns equity in a company — is closely guarded at most high-profile startups, and winning a spot on one requires either being invited by the company or purchasing shares from existing investors with the company’s blessing.

“It’s very difficult to get into any of these companies, and the investment rounds are very expensive,” acknowledged Pinto.

That is just one of the reasons democratizing private markets is easier said than done, and why the companies most retail investors actually want to own remain, for now, out of reach.

Robinhood embraces copy trading after warning competitors about regulatory risks


What a difference a changing regulatory environment makes.

Roughly nine months after suggesting that a young copy trading platform could only operate because it flew “under the radar” of regulators, Robinhood has announced its own entry into the space with “Robinhood Social,” a new feature that will allow users to follow and manually replicate the trades of prominent investors.

The move represents a striking about-face for the online brokerage, which has historically been cautious about features that could attract regulatory scrutiny. The company famously ditched its celebratory digital confetti feature ahead of its 2021 IPO after regulators raised concerns about gamifying trading, making its embrace of copy trading, another potentially gamified feature, all the more notable.

This wariness was on full display in December, when in a conversation with this editor about upstart copy trading platform Dub, Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev suggested that such platforms could operate primarily because of their smaller size, proposing that “copy trading could become of greater interest to regulators” and that Dub may not yet be under the “magnifying glass” because of its “comparatively smaller size.”

Now, Robinhood is betting that the regulatory landscape has changed enough to safely enter the copy trading market.

The timing is particularly notable given the pointed criticism Robinhood faced earlier this year from Dub’s 23-year-old founder Steven Wang, who has positioned his platform as a more educationally-focused alternative to traditional trading apps.

“I have a lot of respect for what [CEO] Vlad [Tenev] has done in making trading free,” Wang told me back in February. “But at the end of the day, making it super easy to trade without expert guidance, without education, is really just gambling for the broader population.”

Techcrunch event

San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025

Wang has consistently argued that Dub’s approach – which includes risk scores, risk-adjusted returns, and portfolio stability metrics – represents a safer alternative to platforms like Robinhood. In his conversation with TechCrunch, Wang was also critical of Robinhood’s decision to offer meme coins like TRUMP, saying the incentives are “misaligned between these big platforms that are public companies now that need to make money.”

Tuesday’s news, announced at Robinhood’s company event earlier in the day, brought to mind the possibility that Robinhood had, in fact, acquired four-year-old Dub, which officially launched just last year and has so far raised $47 million in funding from investors. But reached for comment, a Robinhood spokesperson responded via email, “No, this is not an acquisition, we are building our own platform in Robinhood.” A request for comment from Wang was not returned by press time.

Robinhood’s version of copy trading differs meaningfully from platforms like Dub and established players like eToro, which has offered copy trading to U.S. users for years through its CopyTrader feature. While eToro allows automatic copying of other traders’ portfolios in real-time (with U.S. users limited to copying only other U.S. traders due to regulations), Dub allows users to automatically copy entire portfolios for a $10 monthly subscription, and Robinhood Social will require users to manually replicate trades, a distinction that may help address regulatory concerns.

The platform, set to launch early next year, will feature verified traders and display the activities of famous investors and members of Congress. Unlike the informal copy trading that happens on social media, Robinhood will require identity verification and proof of actual portfolio positions. The plan, according to the company, is to first invite 10,000 Robinhood Social users to test out the service before rolling it out more widely.

The launch comes at a time when the regulatory landscape is fast evolving. Crypto companies were scrutinized heavily under the Biden administration, while numerous crypto companies have become publicly traded companies in recent months, their path eased by the Trump administration’s crypto-friendly stance. Meanwhile, copy trading – long common in Europe but heavily restricted in the U.S. – may be gaining acceptance finally.

Seen through that lense, Robinhood’s entry into copy trading represents more than just another feature launch; it could signal the opening of floodgates for a wave of new platforms. If Robinhood can successfully negotiate the legal landscape that has long limited copy trading in the U.S., other fintech outfits seem likely to follow suit. eToro’s successful May IPO, which raised $310 million and saw shares surge 29% on their debut, has already demonstrated strong investor appetite for copy trading platforms.

Whether this potential wave is good news or bad for retail investors  – or it will mostly serve to boost fintech valuations – is an open question. For right now, Robinhood’s shareholders are probably the clearest winners.

Robinhood agrees to pay $45M in SEC settlement


Robinhood has agreed to fork out $45 million to settle an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission over several alleged violations, reported the Wall Street Journal on Monday.

The settlement is being made via two of Robinhood’s brokerage units. One of the violations relates to Robinhood’s November 2021 confirmation that it was hacked “with more than five million customer email addresses and two million customer names taken, as well as a much smaller set of more specific customer data.”

The SEC alleged that the two units covered by the settlement — Robinhood Securities and Robinhood Financial — did not “adopt sufficient policies and procedures to protect customer information,” reported the WSJ.

The Robinhood units also did not put a program in place to sufficiently protect customers against identity theft, the SEC also charged.