Scientists are teaching OLED screens how to shine smarter


You know that annoying moment when you step outside on a sunny day, pull out your phone, and suddenly can’t see a single thing on the screen? You’re squinting, cranking the brightness slider all the way to the max, and watching your battery percentage nosedive in real-time. It’s a struggle we all deal with. Well, a team of researchers over in South Korea might have just fixed that for good, and they managed to do it without turning our sleek phones into bulky bricks.

A group from KAIST, led by Professor Seunghyup Yoo, just published some pretty massive findings in Nature Communications. Basically, they have figured out a way to make OLED screens—the kind found in most high-end phones and TVs these days—significantly brighter. And the best part? They didn’t have to sacrifice that ultra-thin, flat look that we all love.

Here is the thing about current OLEDs

They are actually kind of inefficient. We love them because the colors pop and the blacks are super deep, but there is a hidden flaw. Apparently, nearly 80% of the light these screens generate never actually makes it to your eyes. It gets trapped inside the display layers, bouncing around and eventually just turning into heat. That is why your phone gets hot when you are watching high-res videos, and it’s a huge waste of battery power.

In the past, engineers tried to fix this by slapping tiny lenses on top of the pixels to help the light escape. Think of it like putting a magnifying glass over a lightbulb. It works, but it has issues. The lenses either made the screen too thick (nobody wants a bumpy TV) or they messed with the picture quality by blurring the pixels together.

The KAIST team took a completely different approach. Instead of treating the light source like some infinite, theoretical thing, they redesigned the screen structure based on the actual, finite size of real pixels. They created this new “near-planar” structure that acts like those old bulky lenses but stays incredibly thin. It effectively guides the light straight out toward you without letting it spread sideways and muddy up the picture.

For us regular users, this is huge

It means future phones could be twice as bright without using any extra battery power. Or, flip that around: you could keep the same brightness you have now but use way less energy, meaning your phone might actually last through a whole day of heavy use. Plus, since trapped light causes heat and heat kills electronics, these new screens should last longer before degrading or getting that dreaded “burn-in.”

The researchers are also saying this tech isn’t just for today’s OLEDs. It could work with next-gen stuff like quantum dots too. It feels like we are finally moving past the era of choosing between a battery that lasts or a screen we can actually see.

Are you buying a drone soon? Here’s how the FCC’s move affects you


The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has just taken a massive swing at the drone industry, blocking new foreign-made drones – including those from DJI – from entering the American market. By adding them to the “Covered List,” the agency is effectively labeling these devices a national security threat. It’s a huge blow to DJI, which currently owns about 90 percent of the consumer market, as Washington grows increasingly worried that these drones could be used by Beijing to peek at sensitive U.S. data.

Washington expands restrictions as concerns grow over Chinese drone dominance

The FCC’s new rule means that any fresh drone models from DJI or other flagged foreign makers can’t get the agency’s seal of approval for import or sale in the States. The commission isn’t just worried about data privacy; they’ve raised alarms about potential drone-based attacks and unauthorized surveillance. FCC Chair Brendan Carr made it clear: while drones are great for innovation, they are being weaponized by “hostile foreign actors,” and the U.S. isn’t willing to take that risk anymore.

There is a bit of a silver lining for current owners, though. The ruling doesn’t actually ground the drones that are already flying. If a drone or component was approved before this ban, it can still be used and even sold. This is a big relief for the police departments, farmers, and construction crews that already have fleets of DJI drones in the air. Still, it’s a clear sign that the U.S. is trying to untangle itself from Chinese aerial tech as fast as possible.

The move has been cheered by “China hawks” in Congress.

Rep. Elise Stefanik and Sen. Rick Scott were quick to call this a win for American security, arguing that we can’t let sensitive mapping data of our infrastructure be sent overseas. They see this as the first step toward building up “U.S. drone dominance” and moving away from a reliance on foreign hardware.

Unsurprisingly, China isn’t happy. A spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in Washington accused the U.S. of using “national security” as a convenient excuse to mess with global trade. DJI also hit back, expressing deep disappointment and pointing out that the U.S. hasn’t actually shown any public evidence that their drones have been compromised.

So, where does this leave the industry? While your current drone isn’t going to fall out of the sky tomorrow, the path forward is looking a lot more restricted. This ruling creates a huge opening – and a lot of pressure – for American drone companies to finally step up and offer a real alternative. We’re entering a period where the drone market will be shaped just as much by international politics as it is by new cameras or better battery life.

CES 2025 day 2 live blog: Garmin, Amazfit, and more



Love them or hate them, but robotaxis have certainly been making headlines in 2024. And beyond the glamorous, sci-fi-inspired marketing around Tesla’s recently unveiled Cybercab robotaxi, safety has remained, in one way or another, a recurring theme.

Earlier this year, a survey revealed a majority of the U.S. public, or 68%, brought up safety concerns when asked what they thought about having self-driving vehicles (SDVs) on public roads. Yet within that majority, more than half either believe that SDV safety issues can be addressed or that SDVs will actually be safer than humans.