Google is now selling the Mous Pixel Watch Charger, the first Google-certified third-party charger for the Pixel Watch 4.
It delivers 5.6W fast charging using official Google charging hardware and a dual-part authentication IC to ensure safe, verified charging.
The charger is only compatible with the Pixel Watch 4, and costs $49.99.
Google has finally cracked open the door to third-party charging accessories for the Pixel Watch 4. You can now buy the “Mous Pixel Watch Charger,” the first Google-certified third-party charger for the Pixel Watch 4, directly from the Google Store.
Don’t want to miss the best from Android Authority?
Spotted by folks at 9to5Google, the Mous Pixel Watch Charger is priced at $49.99, and is built using “official Google Pixel Watch charging hardware.” That means it’s designed to meet Google’s safety and performance standards, something other Pixel Watch 4 third-party chargers haven’t offered till now.
The charger supports 5.6W fast contact charging, and the listing mentions that to get full performance, you’ll need a 7.5W or higher USB-C power source.
One of the standout specs of the Mous Pixel Watch Charger is “dual-part authentication IC.” Theoretically, this means there should be two authentication chips involved when using the charger — one in the charger itself and one inside the Pixel Watch 4. Before charging starts, both components verify each other’s identity to ensure the charger is officially certified and safe to use.
Elsewhere, the Mous Pixel Watch Charger uses pogo-pin contact charging, and interestingly, the pogo connectors also enable modular upgrades, allowing the charger to work with other Mous charging accessories in the future.
The charger is only compatible with the Pixel Watch 4 and won’t work with older Pixel Watch models.
Thank you for being part of our community. Read our Comment Policy before posting.
When you buy your Apple Watch, you get to choose which band you get. Skip the rubber bands, which are made from fluoroelastomer. While the company committed to removing PFAS from its products in 2022, we have not gotten confirmation that Apple’s products are PFAS-free.
I find the textile and metal bands to be much more attractive and comfortable than fluoroelastomer bands, which tend to trap sweat and irritate my skin. My favorite of the Apple bands you can choose at checkout this year is the Nike nylon woven Sport Loop. It’s soft, breathable, soaks up sweat, and is infinitely adjustable if your wrists swell when you run. It’s made from recycled polyester, spandex, and nylon, and the yarn is reflective if you’re running at night. It comes in five colors and three sizes, so it’s compatible with the 40-, 44-, and 46-mm watch sizes.
For one reason (coffee) or another (a small child), I constantly find myself with full hands. Simultaneously, the organization of the day relies heavily on a carefully curated alarm schedule. As a result, I am often left desperately trying to dismiss my buzzing smartwatch with just one hand. While I’m well aware of gesture controls, a deviant part of my brain insists on making do with another appendage instead: my nose.
Do you use your nose to navigate your wearable?
134 votes
Blame it on being a millennial, but I struggle with the principle of delayed gratification when it comes to tech. My adrenaline spikes at the sight of an alert, the feel of a vibration, or the sound of a ping. I need the dopamine hit that comes from seeing what’s happening on my device. You should see me when I can’t figure out which of the 15 fitness trackers on my desk is vibrating. Needless to say, if the device on my wrist wants to show me something, I need to see it, even if it means abandoning my dignity. Rather than waiting until my fingers are free, I am that person in the cereal aisle, nosing her smartwatch.
Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority
I know that gesture controls aren’t exactly new. These “hand-free” options aim to make tech more accessible and convenient, and for the most part, I applaud the effort. But the truth is, they rarely live up to expectations. For example, I was very excited to test Apple’s Double Tap when it launched, but a generation later, it still doesn’t offer the functionality I actually want. Most of the time, I end up looking like I’m trying to make a tiny alligator hand puppet chomp air. My nose, on the other hand, offers more tangible interactions — even if I look equally ridiculous doing it.
Unlike gesture controls, my nose offers more tangible interactions.
When an alarm sounds, I take my watch to the face and hit snooze. When my family chat blows up, I nod up and down to see which sibling is cracking a joke. When the notifications I keep forgetting to disable pop up excessively, I Pinocchio them right back into the ether.
Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority
Ironically, my nose faces similar issues as my fingers. (Yes, I’ve done this enough times that I’ve even identified problem areas). First, like any fair-skinned freckle face, I was taught to fear the wrath of the sun at an early age and apply SPF accordingly. A greasy nose doesn’t play great with touchscreens, and the resulting smudges are gross enough to make me question my life choices. Likewise, if my watch is wet, my nose’s tippy taps are even less effective.
Cold and flu season isn’t great for this method, either. Nasal runoff (aka boogers) can mess with the screen’s responsiveness. Considering winter gloves are one of the biggest hindrances to touchscreen use, it’s unfortunate that cold weather and stuffy noses often go hand in hand. Notably, your chin will work, but it’s a bit of a blunt instrument. With my nose, I can still see the screen as I scroll down a text thread or tap into a notification. It’s not the most refined behavior, but I make it as respectable as I can. Using my chin? Well, it’s more of a pecking-chicken motion.
SPF sunscreen still poses an issue, and so does a wet touchscreen.
The more I digress, the more I realize this is not my finest act as a wearables reviewer, but hey, I know I am not alone. At least one other Android Authority editor, who will remain nameless, signed off on this assignment in light of their own experience with nose-based interactions. I also found some Reddit threads of people celebrating the innovative use of their snouts. I can confirm that the elbows and toes will also work, as will presumably most body parts. If you find yourself holding a baby when a text comes in, their little feet also do the trick. I’d assume their adorable noses would also work, but I can’t, in good conscience, condone that.
For months now, I’ve been wanting to sit down and lament the fact that my Pixel Watch 3 has fewer watch face options than the Pixel Watch 2 and 1, and the same is true for the Galaxy Watch 7 compared to the previous Watch 6, 5, and 4. Today is finally the day, so let’s take a look at what’s happening with our most beloved smartwatches and whether things might change anytime soon.
These limited face options have been an issue since both watches landed in late summer / early fall, and it’s all thanks to Wear OS 5. With this new version of the platform, Google made Watch Face Format mandatory, which nerfed every custom Watch Face app out there, like the beloved Facer, Pujie, KWCH, WatchMaker, and more. Several months down the line, the issue is still there, with no solution in sight for people who love this customization or the developers behind these apps.
Do you use Facer, Pujie, KWCH, WatchMaker, or other custom watch face apps?
5 votes
What’s Watch Face Format, and how is it different from Facer, Pujie, KWCH, and WatchMaker?
Rita El Khoury / Android Authority
In May of 2023, Google announced Watch Face Format, an XML template for designers that lets them create new watch faces that behave as well as native ones. This preset template was made to combat the slew of poorly designed, poorly functional faces that ate away at our watches’ battery life, never showed the right stats, and required separate companion apps on our phones to run.
It took a while, but Watch Face Format (WFF) started getting adopted by many developers, resulting in lightweight faces that integrate directly into the Pixel Watch and Galaxy Wearables app, sip at the battery, and support all the same watch face complications (the little battery stats, steps, and whatnot) as the faces that ship directly on your smartwatch.
The only issue with WFF faces, as you can guess, is that they don’t allow for much creativity. Since developers have to follow a template, there’s little room to go beyond the confines of what Google allows. Animated backgrounds, for one, seem next to impossible. The faces are a bit uniform and monotonous, and you have to dig for a while to find some gems that manage to eschew the default Google-heavy look. Over time, though, Google has added more capabilities to the template, and now you can find some great examples on the Play Store.
For about a year, Watch Face Format and non-WFF faces coexisted. I could install both types on my Pixel Watch 2 and have the best of both worlds: optimized faces with little creativity and unoptimized faces with a lot of creativity.
Facer (10+ million installs), Pujie (100,000+ installs), WatchMaker (5+ million installs), and KWCH (10,000+ installs) fall within that latter category. They’re essentially large umbrella apps that let you create watch faces from scratch, import templates made by other users, and/or buy premade faces. Here’s a small sample of some free faces I was able to get from Facer back in 2022. None of these were perfect, but I love how different and unique they all were!
All of these apps use their own templates and design paradigms. And since their app essentially acts as a marketplace of third-party faces, none of them are supported by WFF, which requires every face to be published individually to the Play Store.
How Wear OS 5 spelled the end of Facer, Pujie, KWCH, and WatchMaker
With Wear OS 5, Google decided that enough is enough — watch face developers either had to play along and adopt the universal template, or they wouldn’t be able to get their creations on people’s wrists. Starting with the Galaxy Watch 7 and Pixel Watch 3, you simply couldn’t install a face on your watch if it wasn’t built using Watch Face Format. (If your watch came with Wear OS 3 or 4 out of the box and you updated it to Wear OS 5, you still retain access to non-WFF faces, for now.)
Essentially, this made it impossible to use any non-WFF faces I’d previously bought or any app like Facer, Pujie, KWCH, or WatchMaker. On my Pixel Watch 3, for several months, the Play Store would even completely force close if I dared search for the word “facer” or “pujie.” Now, it either throws me other watch face suggestions or it spins indefinitely while saying it didn’t find any results.
If you’re insistent enough, you might be able to bypass this using Wear Installer 2 and this trick shared by u/wowbyowen, but in general, it’s safe to say that non-WFF faces are going the way of the dodo on Wear OS.
Will Facer, Pujie, KWCH, and WatchMaker ever come to Wear OS 5?
Andy Walker / Android Authority
So far, this has all been gloom and doom, and my initial research into the topic revealed a similar pessimism from many users and developers alike.
There is nothing I (or any other custom watchface like watchmaker or facer) can do about this, this needs to be fixed by the vendor allowing custom watchface application to be installed.
But once I dug in, I noticed that other developers seemed more optimistic — emphasis on the past tense because all these statements date back to three months ago. For example, the Pujie team shared this on Reddit:
The Pixel Watch 3, the Galaxy Watch 7 and Galaxy Watch 7 Ultra only support watch faces made with the Watch Face Format. Unfortunately this format, as it exists right now, is not suitable for advanced interactive watch faces like the ones you can make with Pujie and can only be installed from the Play Store.
Rest assured, together with other watch face developers, I am talking with Google to see if there is a solution to this problem. Hopefully I can update this information soon.
I can’t find any official word from KWCH, but u/acpjaydixit claims they reached out to them, and they reiterated that they’re also working with Google to find a solution. This was also four months ago.
We have been working with Google on this project for 18 months and will certainly be supporting WFF once this is possible for marketplace apps such as WatchMaker.
The clearest and most detailed answer, though, comes from Facer. Given the app’s popularity and its large install base on 10+ million devices, you can imagine how huge the loss is to the fans of this app, as well as the creators using it as a platform to monetize and sell their designs, and the team behind Facer. In a long blog post shared on its own forums, the Facer team explained the issue with Wear OS 5 and Watch Face Format, said that it’s working with Google to fix this issue, and promised to continue manually converting some of its most popular faces to the WFF.
For users of the Pixel Watch 3, Samsung Galaxy Watch7 and Ultra, we are working hard with Google to bring the Facer service to you as well, and until that is done we will progressively bring some of our best watch faces to you in the Google Play store. You can find these faces here.
Once again, this was three months ago. There’s been radio silence since then.
I really appreciate Watch Face Format and the standardized requirements it’s brought to the Wild West of watch faces. I also want the format to become more widely adopted, but I don’t want this to be at the expense of the intricate customization and creativity that apps like Facer and Pujie offer. I can only hope that Google is still trying to accommodate these developers to make their beloved apps available on Wear OS 5.
