Category: Hi-end PC

South Korean chip giant Samsung Electronics has reached an agreement with its labour union, mere hours before workers were due to begin an 18-day strike. The planned action was due to be taken today, Wednesday, May 21, but the union has agreed to suspend the strike and put a new proposal to an internal vote.

Details of the terms of the proposal are yet to be revealed, but the union previously pushed for Samsung to allocate 15% of its annual operating profits to employee bonuses (via Tom’s Hardware). The union also proposed the scrapping of a 50% annual salary cap on performance pay-outs.

Before we sing the praises of EPYC PC workstations, let’s take a quick step back. Oftentimes, the title of “workstation” is donned upon a computer for the programs it runs rather than the contents of its case. For some, it could be a beefed-up desktop processor, a professional-grade GPU, and some ECC memory. However, the explosion of artificial intelligence, complex computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and large-scale 3D rendering has pushed traditional hardware to its limits. To keep up with these massive data pipelines, professionals are increasingly turning to server-grade infrastructure packed into a workstation chassis.

At the forefront of this shift is the AMD EPYC processor. While Intel’s Xeon and AMD’s own Threadripper Pro have long been the go-to solutions for heavy enterprise workloads, EPYC PC workstations offer a distinct set of advantages in memory bandwidth, core density, and multi-GPU scalability that leave the competition in the dust.

Here is a closer look at the specific benefits an EPYC workstation can offer your pipeline.

AMD EPYC PCs: Dominating Core Density and Efficiency

When squaring off against Intel Xeon workstations (such as the Xeon W-3400 series), AMD EPYC dominates in raw scale and parallel processing capabilities.

• Unmatched Core Density: AMD’s latest EPYC processors (like the 9005 Turin series) boast up to a staggering 192 cores and 384 threads per socket. By comparison, Intel’s highest-end workstation and server offerings consistently trail behind in raw core count. For workloads that scale linearly with cores, such as CPU-based rendering or large-scale virtualization, EPYC handles massively parallel operations with significantly less bottlenecking.

• Superior PCIe Lane Availability: Modern workloads often require massive I/O pipelines to feed NVMe storage arrays and multi-GPU setups. EPYC processors offer up to 160 PCIe 5.0 lanes (in single or dual-socket configurations). By contrast, Intel’s flagship W-3400 workstation CPUs cap out at 112 PCIe 5.0 lanes. This massive I/O advantage means EPYC users don’t have to compromise on bandwidth when running multiple high-end AI accelerators or network cards.

• Power Efficiency: Built on advanced chiplet architecture (Zen 4/Zen 5) and smaller manufacturing nodes, EPYC processors provide incredibly high performance-per-watt. In sustained, compute-heavy server/workstation workloads, EPYC uses less energy for equivalent or superior performance, making it highly cost-effective over its lifecycle.

AMD EPYC vs. Threadripper Pro: Server-Grade Scale at the Desk

AMD’s Threadripper Pro is arguably the best traditional workstation processor on the market, offering incredible single-core boost clocks for interactive 3D modeling and engineering software. However, when the workload transitions from content creation to massive computation and data processing, EPYC clearly takes the lead.

• Massive Memory Bandwidth and Capacity: The memory controller is where EPYC truly separates itself. Threadripper Pro (9000 WX-Series) features an impressive 8-channel DDR5 memory architecture supporting up to 2TB of RAM. EPYC, however, is a true server platform. It features a 12-channel DDR5 memory architecture, delivering 50% more bandwidth (up to 576 GB/s) and supporting up to a massive 6TB of RAM per socket. For memory-bound tasks like training large language models (LLMs) or genomics sequencing, EPYC keeps the GPU pipelines fed where Threadripper Pro might bottleneck.

• Dual-Socket Scalability: Threadripper Pro is strictly a single-socket platform. EPYC motherboards are built to scale. You can configure a dual-socket EPYC PC workstation to wield massive core counts (up to 384 physical cores and 24 memory channels in a single system), offering computing density that Threadripper Pro physically cannot match.

• 4-to-8 GPU Configurations: While Threadripper Pro’s 128 PCIe 5.0 lanes can technically support four GPUs, the WRX90 motherboard ecosystem is heavily restrictive for full 4+ GPU setups. EPYC platforms are native to high-density accelerator layouts. If you are building a deep learning workstation with 4 to 8 GPUs, EPYC is the required platform to ensure that PCIe lane sharing does not cripple your bandwidth.

Is an EPYC PC the Right Choice for You?

If your daily workflow relies on high-frequency, single-threaded responsiveness (like active CAD design or interactive VFX workspaces), Threadripper Pro or a high-clocked Intel CPU remains a stellar choice. But if you are building an AI training node, processing massive datasets, or rendering complex fluid dynamics, you need the unrestricted memory bandwidth, high PCIe lane counts, and core density of AMD EPYC.

For organizations ready to bring data-center-level power directly into the office environment, deploying an enterprise-ready system is a must. The Velocity Micro ProMagix HD360A EPYC PC Workstation is a phenomenal option, expertly engineered to leverage EPYC’s incredible parallel performance, massive memory limits, and robust PCIe arrays inside a reliable, quiet, and premium chassis.

Microsoft has been leaning hard into the idea that what matters with Windows is getting the basics right, as opposed to bolting on more AI gunk. An early example of that drive is a recent announcement involving more configurability for the taskbar and Start menu in Windows 11.

In a blog post titled, “Improving Windows quality: Making Taskbar and Start more personal,” Microsoft kicks off with the taskbar, which is “where your PC experience comes to life” according to the post.

Whenever I remember I have 80 hours logged in Terraria, I’m a little shocked because it doesn’t feel like I put nearly that much time into it. Turns out, those are rookie numbers anyway—in a blog post published yesterday, developer Re-Logic shared a bunch of stats and revealed that the average PC player’s logged time was 101 hours and 18 minutes.

Given how many players don’t complete the RPGs they buy, that’s a pretty impressive stat for a 15-year-old survival game. It probably helps that it’s pretty good—Luke Winkie called it “one of the best adventures out there” in his 83% re-review from 2018—and that it just can’t seem to stop growing, with each new gargantuan update making former claims that it was finished seem increasingly absurd.

Final Fantasy 14 has sent my unintimidating, run-of-the-mill-looking cat girl on all manner of world-saving missions. She’s squared up with a dying god on the moon, fist fought an alien super weapon, and even confronted the literal embodiment of nihilism at the ends of the universe. My girl has been through a lot, but the MMO is pretty good at making me feel like there’s no challenge I can’t rise to meet.

Well, that is until you give her a fishing rod. For a cat person, my little Warrior of Light absolutely sucks with a rod and tackle box. You would think the hero of the universe could do a little black magic and complete her fishing log, but nah. I haven’t even caught fish that Final Fantasy 14 added over a decade ago. It’s that dire.