Buyer’s Guide: How to Choose the Right Travel and Expense Management Solutions


In a business environment where efficiency and control have a significant impact, the strategic value of an intelligent, integrated travel and expense (T&E) platform has never been more critical. Disconnected systems, manual processes, and incomplete data create operational friction and financial risk.

This guide is designed for finance, procurement, travel, and IT leaders who understand these challenges and are seeking a solution that delivers not just automation, but true strategic advantage.

You’ll learn:

  • What a truly integrated T&E solution means for enterprise, midmarket, and small businesses
  • Essential capabilities of a future-ready T&E platform
  • 13 key questions to ask when evaluating technology vendors

Featuring insights from the 2025 IDC MarketScape reports, where SAP Concur is named a Leader in AI-enabled T&E applications across enterprise, midmarket, and small business segments, this guide provides an evidence-based roadmap to transform your spend management strategy.

Download the guide to discover how a unified, intelligent T&E platform can deliver lasting strategic advantage.

Meta’s $18B child-safety deal hinges on age verification tech that doesn’t work well


Meta reached an $18 billion settlement on Wednesday over a lawsuit brought by 29 U.S. states concerning children’s safety. The settlement is historic in scale as Meta agrees with a group of 52 attorneys general to implement sweeping changes to how minors use Instagram and Facebook.

The settlement “gives the AGs what they want, which is the political story that they’ve extracted a huge amount of benefit for the public from this settlement, including the platform changes,” Jessica Nall, a technology litigator at Withers, told TechCrunch. But Nall noted the settlement’s real-dollar impact is softer than the headline number suggests. “The fact that it’s being paid over 10 years really does blunt the financial impact of the large number, especially compared to Meta’s annual revenue… We’re talking about one of these tech companies where their annual revenue is larger than the GDP of most European countries.”

Indeed, Meta reported more than $200 billion in total revenue in 2025, which puts the $18 billion price tag in perspective. But the bigger story here isn’t the dollar amount. It’s what Meta now has to build: the most detailed child-safety rules any major platform has agreed to, resting on age-verification technology that still doesn’t work particularly well.

Meta hasn’t admitted wrongdoing, even as it settles allegations that it intentionally designed its platforms to keep children hooked — a common tactic for companies looking to avoid a jury trial, where the risk of a worse outcome is higher. A ruling against Meta could also have jeopardized the legal protections that allow social platforms to escape liability for what users post.

“I think it’s wise of them to try to get out of it, especially without a legal finding against them on any of the First Amendment issues and the Section 230 issues, which are still alive,” Nall said. “That could be existential, potentially, not just for Meta but for every tech company that has a product that engages with users, which is almost all of them.”

Meta’s settlement also reignites ongoing concern over age verification measures that are intended to protect children online but can, in practice, create new privacy risks for both kids and adults.

“This is a classic debate around prioritizing safety over privacy,” Dr. Alexis Ingber, a professor of communications at Syracuse University, told TechCrunch. “The perspective is, if we want to keep children safe on Meta platforms, here are all the design things we’re gonna have to do, but we’re gonna have to also do this age verification thing that’s gonna take away from people’s data privacy and will introduce these new data privacy concerns.”

Under the settlement’s terms, Meta has proposed a list of design changes, including a default two-hour daily screen-time limit for app use, plus prompts that appear every 15 minutes to “encourage intentional use.” Accounts that Meta identifies as belonging to minors will also default to being blocked from Meta apps overnight (between midnight and 6 a.m.) and will have notifications muted during school hours (8 a.m. to 3 p.m.). By default, teens won’t be able to see ‘like’ counts on their own posts or others’, among other changes.

“The design changes that were proposed in the settlement seem great on paper, but they are all reliant upon successful, effective, and unbiased age verification technology,” Dr. Ingber said. “You need to be able to identify that that’s a child versus an adult, and the way that we do that right now is not really effective… I’m very curious to see how Meta is going to move forward with trying to do that, given that by and large, these technologies have failed.”

Age-verification technology has evolved well beyond clicking “Yes, I am 21” on a liquor website. Companies now typically verify age through biometric scans (like a selfie), government ID checks, or analysis of behavioral patterns, and each comes with its own flaws. Behavioral analysis can misjudge adults as minors or vice versa, while ID and biometric checks require kids, and adults, to hand sensitive documents over to a third party just to use an app.

Some users also don’t trust platforms to roll out age-verification responsibly. Discord learned this firsthand when it tried to implement global age verification earlier this year and had to delay the rollout after significant user backlash.

Not everyone shares that pessimism, though. “I think the technology has evolved quite a bit in the last few years since these concerns started coming up, and I do think there are ways that [companies] can provide or implement age assurance technologies,” Philip Yannella, co-chair of the privacy and data security group at law firm Blank Rome, told TechCrunch. “I’m not going to say they won’t have potential privacy issues, but they could greatly lessen the privacy issues.”

Yannella added that companies don’t need to store users’ personal information to verify their age.

“There are ways you can verify someone’s age, create a token that would signal that this particular IP is associated with someone who’s below the age of 13, below the age of 16, whatever it is, but discard the personal information,” he said.

Still, Ingber and other experts caution that even if companies don’t retain this data, simply transmitting sensitive identity information online carries its own privacy risk. A breach of ID scans or facial biometric data tied to minors creates the risk of identity theft, and unlike a password, a leaked face or fingerprint can’t be changed.

Meanwhile, as Meta and the 52 state attorneys general finalize these guidelines — which Meta must follow for the next 10 years — the company is framing the settlement not as a concession, but as proof that it’s a leader in children’s online safety. Meta is now running full-page newspaper ads calling on TikTok and YouTube to adopt similar design changes, without mentioning that its own adoption came as part of a legal settlement. Under the agreement, roughly 30% of Meta’s settlement payment depends on whether TikTok and YouTube also comply with these guidelines.

While Ingber worries that Meta and other companies won’t be able to meet these commitments without relying on potentially insecure verification mechanisms, she sees the settlement as evidence of a bigger cultural shift.

“Meta has extraordinary power to create norms through its platform design,” she said. “If you change the way that the platform is designed, you can set new norms. You can make things better.”

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

If you have a Pixel 11 Pro XL, you need to turn on this hidden feature to boost your charging time


Once upon a time, Pixels pioneered fast charging standards, shipping with 18W chargers in the box, leaving most other smartphone companies in the dust. But over the years, as phone charging standards have evolved, Pixels have remained alongside Samsung and Apple phones as the slowest-charging smartphones on the market.

The Pixel 11 series charges noticeably more slowly out of the box than the Pixel 10, even with the same charger, but a hidden setting fixes the issue if you meet certain conditions. It’s called Extreme Charging, and it’s the first time we’ve seen Google directly address this problem with a unique, non-hardware-based solution.

kintone – Market Report – Tech Research Online


Managing complex operational workflows and customer relationships often requires more than just rigid, off-the-shelf software. Kintone stands out as an all-in-one, highly customizable CRM solution that prioritizes unique operational pain points over standard feature sets, functioning more like a strategic partner than a simple software provider.

Based on real user insights and market data, this report explores why Kintone is a top-rated choice for businesses seeking impactful ROI and a truly adaptive platform. Key advantages highlighted in the report include:

  • Customizable, no-code workflows that adapt to your evolving business requirements.
  • Centralized data and communication in a single, user-friendly cloud platform.
  • Exceptional support and ease of use, with a 9.4/10 support rating on TrustRadius.
  • Measurable efficiency gains, including significantly reduced reporting time and improved data reliability.

Download TrustRadius’ market report to see how Kintone stacks up in the CRM landscape and learn why operational leaders choose Kintone to solve their most complex business challenges.

Zillow and Redfin settle FTC antitrust case


Zillow and Redfin have reached a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and five states, ending a legal fight over a 2025 partnership that the FTC claimed hurt competition in the rental-listing market. The settlement was announced on Monday, just as the case was scheduled to head toward trial this morning. 

The case stems from a deal announced last year in which Redfin agreed to display Zillow’s rental listings on its websites rather than compete directly with Zillow for rental advertisers. The arrangement could have kept Redfin out of the rental advertising business for as long as nine years. Redfin owns Rent.com and ApartmentGuide.com, two major rental-listing platforms. 

According to the FTC and attorneys general from Arizona, Connecticut, New York, Virginia, and Washington, Zillow agreed to pay Redfin $100 million to keep Redfin from competing with Zillow.

The companies defended the partnership as a way to give renters access to a larger pool of listings. The FTC, however, argued that Zillow was paying one of its largest competitors to stop competing, potentially allowing the company to charge higher prices and provide less favorable terms to property managers. It could have also reduced the quality of rental listings available to consumers.

Under the proposed settlement, Redfin will be required to reenter the rental advertising business. The order also removes restrictions that previously limited Redfin’s ability to compete independently for property-management customers.

The settlement doesn’t completely end the relationship between the two companies. Redfin can continue displaying Zillow’s rental listings, but it will once again be able to compete for its own customers. Redfin will be able to sell advertising, display listings from its own clients, and pursue new rental customers without being required to share sensitive business information with Zillow.

The Zillow-Redfin case comes just months after the DOJ’s settlement with Ticketmaster, another antitrust case involving allegations that a dominant company used its power to suppress competition. However, 26 of the 30 state attorneys general who initially sued Live Nation alongside the DOJ chose to continue pursuing the case and won their lawsuit in April.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL vs Pixel 9 Pro XL: Is it actually an upgrade?


Google Pixel 11 Pro XL vs Pixel 9 Pro XL: Design and display

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL vs Pixel 9 Pro XL

(Image credit: Apoorva Bhardwaj / Android Central)

Honestly, there isn’t much of a difference between both phones. Google retained similar dimensions over the last two years, and the result is that the Pixel 9 Pro XL is nearly the same size and weight as the Pixel 11 Pro XL.

This is easily noticeable while holding the phones next to each other. If anything, I like the in-hand feel of the Pixel 9 Pro XL. Google sent me the all-matte Obsidian model of the 11 Pro XL, and it is dull. I like the matte texture, but the phone itself doesn’t look exciting, and I would’ve preferred the vibrant Canyon model instead.

New ‘Slack Code’ turns AI coding into a team activity



With the launch of “Slack Code” channels, Slack this week introduced a new way for developers and non-tech staff to work collaboratively with coding agents.

While Slack already integrates with several coding agents, developers have to interact with them independently to get work done. The aim of Slack Code is to make agents available to multiple coworkers in shared, project-based “code channels.” 

“We built code channels to be this multi-player AI experience and bring more development into Slack,” said Sateja Parulekar, vice president of product marketing at Slack. “It’s not just engineers and product managers who are working with the coding agents; it’s the marketers, the product designers who are now able to interact with a coding agent in a safe, governed environment.”

Slack code channels are intended for one-off coding sessions and projects — building a new application feature, updating a web page, or fixing a bug, for example. 

When the coding agent is tagged in a Slack channel or DM with a request, it automatically creates a new code channel, adds links to required documents, and invites relevant participants. 

The code channel functions just like a normal Slack channel, with participants able to send messages and files as usual, while also letting them interact with a coding agent and track outputs via the channel’s “session artifacts.” These artifacts include “code diffs” that highlight changes to code made by the agent, as well as Slack “canvas” documents and live HTML that displays prototypes and previews created by the agent. 

All participants can use natural language to direct the agent, making suggestions and signing-off on outputs, for instance. Any updates are then highlighted in the original Slack channel. And when a task or project is complete, the code channel is automatically archived.

Slack Code channels can also be customized — Slack admins can create guardrails to prevent non-technical workers from shipping code without engineering review, for example.

Code channels adhere to Slack’s existing security and permissions model, the company said, with agents able to access conversations and data based on controls set for a Slack workspace.

At launch, four agents integrate with Slack Code — Claude Code, Devin, GitHub Copilot, and Vercel — though Slack intends to expand the list of options over time. Slack Code is available at no extra cost on all Slack subscriptions.   

“Slack Code closes the gap between where work gets done and where code gets written with dedicated spaces built for output along project-based channels right in Slack,” said Wayne Kurtzman, research vice president at IDC. “This furthers the Salesforce goal of making work more seamless and multi-player within the Slack environment, regardless of the other applications the business is using. 

“While Slack Code may seem early to market for some companies, others are leveraging the first-mover advantage.”

While software development and coordination work “has happened in Slack forever,” according to Will McKeon-White, senior analyst at Forrester, the new features make it “easier to just stay in Slack only and [open] up who is involved with the actual code creation.”

For IT staffers who enable Slack Code, the immediate consideration involves  permissions, he said — “a persistent challenge for anything multiplayer.” McKeon-White cites various approaches: “…Some inherit user permissions based on task, some have persistent permissions with different ‘invoking’ permissions for users, some inherit the permissions of the room. Each has flaws.” 

The longer-term challenge, he said, is around multi-agent collaboration. 

“Multi-agent collab today in successful environments isn’t very dynamic,” said McKeon-White. “Having true dynamic agents cooperating can create extremely interesting emergent behavior,” he said, pointing to recent Anthropic research on the topic.

While Slack Code is aimed at software development-related tasks, Slack also envisages a similar cross-functional, collaborative approach to AI agent interactions applied to a wider variety of purposes: marketing campaigns, for instance, or legal document reviews. 

“That might not involve code per se, but it does involve a very detailed review of a document and tracking changes and a preview of what’s going to be sent out to the customer,” said Parulekar. “In the future, we see this extending to a lot of different teams and use cases for technical and non-technical users.”

Other features announced Thursday include “agent DMs” that allow for individual interactions with an agent and a new “agents tab” where users can view existing agent conversations.   

Parulekar said Slack Code feeds into a wider Slack strategy centered on a “multi-player experience” for human workers and AI agents. This includes the recent announcement of Claude Tag, which makes Anthropic’s agent available to teams.

“Whether it’s the user experience that we’re evolving — like the agent tab, or coding channels where you can plan, code, test, and ship inside of Slack — it’s all part of that bigger vision of making Slack a great home for agents and furthering that vision of multiplayer AI,” she said.

A New Finance Leader Checklist: 30-60-90-Day Action Plan


Your first 90 days as a finance leader will likely be a whirlwind. Taking time to create a plan and map the steps to achieve it can help you stay on track and measure your progress during this busy time.

To get started, here’s a new finance leader checklist to structure your plan in more detail. The checklist will help you plot your steps to success over the coming months.

Beginning with information gathering and learning in month one, you’ll get tips on who to meet with, how often, and where to focus your conversations.

As you enter your second month, you’re probably establishing informed opinions on what you’ve been learning about the company, its people, and your role. You’ll start to identify opportunities for improvement that can maximize your impact and make a lasting difference for the business.

In your third month, you should be starting to hit your stride in your daily work and establish a certain level of trust with your colleagues. This is a great month to focus on finding solutions to challenges. It’s also time to finalize your ideas on the business and develop an initial plan of actions you want to take.

Inherent, founded by DeepMind alumni, says its AI ‘teammate’ just outperformed Anthropic and OpenAI at replicating research


Inherent, a London AI lab founded by Google DeepMind alumni, says its AI agent just outperformed much larger models from Anthropic and OpenAI using a fraction of the size.

Of all the startups launched by Google DeepMind alumni, Inherent has gotten relatively little attention. But while better-funded rivals have yet to show the world anything concrete, the London-based team is starting to share what it’s been building.

Just weeks after emerging from stealth with a $50 million seed round, the British startup says its newly released AI agent, Faraday, has outperformed larger, better-known models at a specific task: independently reproducing the findings of published scientific papers without being told the answer in advance.

That may sound like a mere party trick given Inherent’s much loftier goal — building AI that can discover new scientific knowledge and not just verify old results. But paper replication is a standard training exercise for human scientists, too, cofounder and chief scientist Edward Hughes said. “Many PhD students actually start by doing this.”

Beating other AI systems at the task wasn’t the point, Hughes told TechCrunch; how they got there was. “What was most interesting to us about this was not so much the result of beating those frontier agents — which of course we liked — but was actually the way we went about building this.”

Here’s the part that should catch an investor’s eye: measured against Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.8 and OpenAI’s GPT-5.5 — both much larger, frontier-scale systems — Faraday runs on a comparatively tiny model called Qwen 3.6 that has just 27 billion parameters. (Roughly speaking, “parameters” is a proxy for a model’s size and, typically, its training costs, as well.) Inherent’s bar for success was also higher than simply accuracy. Beyond replicating results, it wanted Faraday to demonstrate “research taste” — an instinct for what experiments are worth running and how to design them well.

Teaching something as intangible as taste is hard, which is where reinforcement learning comes in. It’s a training method that rewards an AI system for good outcomes rather than spelling out rules for it to follow. Rather than training its agents primarily on the study of how science itself is conducted, Inherent leans on this reward-based approach, betting it will generalize better to its longer-term goal of agents capable of contributing across many scientific fields.

“We’re always guided by that north star of building an AI scientist agent and imbuing our agents with taste,” Hughes said. That focus has also shaped what Inherent chooses not to build. Rather than developing its own coding tool, it had Faraday use OpenAI’s GPT-5.5 Codex instead, much the way human scientists lean on existing software rather than building everything themselves, according to the company.

Inherent is also trying to avoid building agents that simply tell users what they want to hear. Instead, Hughes said, the goal is modeled on his favorite kind of teammate — the kind who comes back and says: “I got curious about this, and I went off and I did these experiments. What do you think of these results?”

That collaborative instinct extends to how Inherent operates as a company. Its dozen employees all work in person out of an office in King’s Cross — the once-rundown London neighborhood that Google DeepMind’s presence helped turn into one of the world’s top AI hubs. “We believe that London is the place to be,” Hughes said.

Hughes is bullish on London’s density of AI talent, but he has also added his voice to calls to end “garden leave” — the practice, common in the U.K., of barring departing employees from joining or starting a rival company for months after they resign. It’s a restriction American researchers generally don’t face, giving U.S. startups a head start on hiring talent who’ve left a prior role. “This is a personal view rather than a company view, but I was affected by the garden leave problem,” he told TechCrunch.

Hughes eventually got around that constraint and started Inherent alongside two other DeepMind alumni and a fourth cofounder. The startup isn’t slowing down either. It plans to grow its headcount to “about 20 to 25” by the end of the year. Given its ambitions in world models as well, and with Demis Hassabis’s new role leaving some DeepMind staff unsettled, Inherent’s hiring push could make it an appealing landing spot for DeepMind employees weighing a move.

Pictured from left to right: Inherent co-founders Louis Kirsch, Kaloyan Aleksiev, Tantum Collins and Edward Hughes.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra review: Let’s call it faux Ultra


Why you can trust Android Central


Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

I knew Samsung hadn’t changed the design with the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra, but it was still surprising to see just how similar it is to last year’s model — I had to double-check the box to confirm I wasn’t sent the Z Fold 7 again.

That sums up the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra in a nutshell; at the surface-level, it is indistinguishable from the Z Fold 7. It is just as thin and light, weighs the same, and has the same in-hand feel. I was holding out on Samsung moving to a design with rounded edges — similar to what Google does with the Pixel 11 Pro Fold — but that isn’t the case.