I spend an unhealthy amount of time lurking in communities where people share aesthetic desktop setups. One of my friends recently set the group chat on fire with a triple monitor setup that had two vertical screens and an ultrawide curved panel at the center. An impulse swipe later, I achieved a similar makeover for my desk at home.
Here’s the problem, though. My $600 workstation overhaul did bring me visual joy, but not much utility. For reporting assignments, I spend the majority of the year away from home, working from deserted cafes or unnaturally uncomfortable bunk beds. I do miss the convenience of large secondary screens. Interestingly, that yearning is addressed by a rather unconventional device —the humble iPad.
Over the past couple of years, I have carried iPads in all shapes and sizes. From the tiny iPad mini and the entry-level iPad to the 13-inch iPad Pro. I have used them extensively for video editing, photo touch-ups, gaming, and reading comics. But the best utility that I’ve got from Apple’s tablet is pushing it as an external monitor.
The problems an iPad solves
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
There is no dearth of minimalist monitors out there. Some are even thinner than the MacBook Air, while a few snap right to the lid, like some protective case. However, there are a few fundamental issues with external monitors, even if you aren’t vexed by lugging one around in your bag.
First, they burden you with the hassle of a wired connection. That, in itself, is troublesome for a couple of reasons. It leads to unnecessary wire clutter. Plus, plugging in an external monitor means you lose one port, for as long as you are working.
In the age of ultra-sleek laptops, ports are a luxury. The MacBook Air, for example, only features a couple of ports. That means you will have to juggle between charging and peripheral connection with the other USB-C port, but can’t do any of it simultaneously.
Yes, that is a full-fledged macOS running on the iPad mini.Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
If your profession entails handling heavy media files, plugging in (or out) external storage is a part of the daily routine. And that means you really a free port always at your disposal. The solution? Of course, prepare to live the dongle life. Or fork out extra cash for a dongle.
The biggest problem of them all? Power draw. You may not always have a power outlet at your disposal, especially if you are someone who works on the move or away from home. I recently tried a sleek external monitor from Arzopa, and quite liked it. But booking up to my laptop drained its battery, and I quickly found myself hunting for a power port.
So there I was, juggling with power bricks, wires, and port anxiety, once again. The iPad solves all those problems in one go. You don’t need any cables. You aren’t burdened by a power-sipping peripheral. You aren’t tasked with handling a clunky third-party app. The iPad is just ready.
The world’s most convenient monitor
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
The Apple ecosystem is just seamless.
No situation exemplifies the above argument better than pairing an iPad to your Mac. Actually, no pairing process is involved. As long as your Mac and iPad are signed in with the same Apple account, you’re good to go. No pain-in-the-back Bluetooth pairing or manual Wi-Fi tethering is needed.
Just bring the two devices close, and it’s a smooth-sailing journey from there. All you need to do is expand the control center, click on the screen mirroring icon, and select your iPad from the drop-down menu. Heck, you can skip that, too.
Just hover the cursor over the green window shortcut in any Mac app, and you will see a dedicated option that says “move to iPad.” A click is all it takes to move that app to your iPad’s screen. That’s it. Your external display is now in action mode.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
In fact, you don’t have to worry about unlocking your iPad. Even in a locked state, you just have to click on the aforementioned window control on your Mac, and it will open on your iPad’s screen directly. No unlock or preparatory setup is needed across either device.
There is nothing that comes even close to this kind of seamless interplay between two entirely different classes of devices — separated across operating systems — except the Apple ecosystem.
Pushing an iPad as a secondary screen
My workflow is divided across more apps than I’d like. Technically, I can access a healthy few of them across browser tabs, but juggling between them is a hassle. I’d much rather hit the Command+Tab shortcut to shift between apps than head back to the mouse, find the appropriate tab, and switch back and forth. Apps, or web instances running as apps, do the job for me.
Moreover, with browsers, it becomes a chore to track the notifications on platforms such as Slack and Discord, where multiple buzzy channels can quickly throw your zen into disarray. It becomes difficult to track such conversations spread across multiple browser tabs.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Apps, therefore, are the most convenient option for me. Of course, that means dedicated windows for each of them. But there’s only so much screen real estate you have on a 13-inch laptop, even with Stage Manager, you only get a partial reprieve.
With an iPad coming into the picture, I can safely switch at least two non-important or chat apps, in split-screen mode on the iPad. That leaves wme ith a near obstructed view of the apps that make up the bulk of my workflow, right in front of my eyes on the laptop screen.
In my case, Teams and Slack usually go on the iPad. Off the work hours, it’s usually a no-distraction slate for writing articles. When I have the iPad Pro handy, photo and video editing is deployed on the tablet’s OLED screen due to the superior color output.
I love that the macOS clipboard works just fine with iPadOS, too.Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
In the lowest-stakes scenario, the iPad mini simply serves as a screen for music playback control, watching lecture videos, or keeping an eye on my social media feed for gathering breaking news events.
A surprising OS versatility
One of the nicest things about Sidecar — the inherent tech that allows an iPad to work well alongside a Mac — is the OS flexibility. You can choose to either wirelessly mirror or extend the screen of your Mac to an iPad. But here’s the nicest part.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Apple’s Universal Control tech allows you to use the Mac’s monitor as the input source on a nearby iPad. And once again, there’s no complex setup required. All you need to do is drag the cursor towards the screen edge near the iPad, and voila, your Mac’s keyboard and touchpad now serve as input devices on the tablet, too.
That means I can control the tablet running iPadOS, and interact with mobile apps in their natural state. It may not sound like much from a functional perspective, but this convenience slowly grows on you. For example, social media platforms such as X or TikTok work better as an app.
Compared to desktop apps, especially task management platforms where the workflow is updated in the cloud, I’ve found mobile apps to be the snappier option. What they lack in features, they make up for with speed and fluidity.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Plus, it’s easier to track notifications on a mobile device compared to a desktop environment. Despite the OS disparity, there is virtually no input, and I can easily copy-paste material across both devices.
I do a lot of standalone work on my iPad Pro, and even used the baseline iPad for the better part of a whole year, but the inherent limitations of iPadOS often repulse me. Overall, my iPads — of which I have an unhealthy number lying on my desk — have found more utility as a secondary screen for my Mac than standalone tablets.
I just wish could solve some of the scaling and screen rotation bugs. And while at it, maybe, enable Stage Manager for the iPad mini, now that it is technically ready from a hardware perspective.
It didn’t take long for wireless earbuds to become ubiquitous. Apple’s AirPods launched back in September 2016, joining notable true wireless headphones from Jabra, Sony, Samsung, and others. Shortly after, they became the go-to choice for many of us when listening to music, podcasts and streaming services on our phones and tablets.
But wireless earbuds can get very dirty very quickly, because not only are we using them a lot, but we take them everywhere: to work, on public transport, on flights and everywhere in between. This is especially true if you’re using them to cancel out noise in a busy office – or are simply working from home at the same time as family or roommates.This means they will come into contact with ear wax, oils and skin cells. Hygiene aside, you should clean your earbuds (and their charging case) because it may result in better-sounding, longer-lasting headphones.
Here’s how you can do that quickly and efficiently. If you’re still a wired headphone holdout (or tempted by DAC-capable buds) most of our cleaning tips hold true – and you don’t have to worry about refreshing a charging case.
How to clean your wireless earbuds
Mat Smith/Engadget
The cleaning process differs depending on what kind of buds you have. First, there are wireless earbuds with removable silicone (or plastic) buds, like Samsung’s Galaxy Buds, Sony’s WF-1000XM5 buds or most Beats buds, and several models with a single solid body, like Apple’s AirPods.
The main difference is that the detachable tips are easier to deep clean. They are also replaceable and spare tips often come in-box. You can also use soapy water or other mild cleaning products on particularly messy tips without fear of damaging the electrical parts of your headphones.
Remove the tips, and gently trace the inside of each bud with cotton swab, or a toothpick if you need something thinner. If any detritus sticks around, upgrade to a metal loop on the end of an earphone cleaning tool, but just go carefully. Metallic objects are more likely to scratch and pierce things. The cleaning tool also has a brush at the other end to pull out any loose dirt. Once clear, wipe the sides of the tips with a slightly damp cloth.
The AirPods Pro tips each have a delicate mesh membrane, making it easier to clean than membranes on the headphones themselves, but they’re also fragile. Apple itself advises that you can rinse the tips with water, adding you shouldn’t use soap or other cleaning products on them. If you do use a damp cloth or rinse them, make sure to set them on a dry cloth and let them dry completely before reattaching them.
Apple advises using cotton swabs or a dry cloth for the microphone and speaker mesh parts of the AirPods. You can also use a bulb air blower, which should provide a mild amount of force to dislodge dirt without harming electrics. However, while it might be stronger, don’t use canned air. Sony says this can force dust further into the microphone or sound outlet holes.
How to clean your wireless earbuds’ charging case
Mat Smith/Engadget
You might find that your charging case is in a worse state than your buds. With deep crevices to pick up dirt from your buds when they’re charging, the case can also pick up pocket-lint from being in, well, pockets and your bag. These cases typically use metal contacts to connect to and charge the buds, so any build-up of dirt or earwax can actually affect recharging your headphones. It pays to keep those charging contacts clean. A soft cloth, or a cotton swab for more difficult-to-reach locations, should be able to capture anything blocking your buds from charging. You could also use a bit of air from a bulb air blower – I find the ones with a brush attached are perfect for this.
For both the earbuds and the case, you can use a thin toothpick to pull away any grime or wax trapped in the seams of the device. Most earbuds are molded plastic, but some have edges and lines that collect dirt together.
If you find your AirPods case or other buds’ case is getting a little grubby – or picking up a blue hue from jeans – you could also invest in a case for your case. There are infinite themed and silicone cases for Apple’s AirPod family, but plenty of options exist for buds made by Samsung, Sony, Google and other companies.
The ubiquity of wireless buds has several companies now offering all-in-one cleaning kits, too. These include established peripheral companies like Belkin, which has a single-use kit that features cleaning fluid to loosen up any tough build-up of wax and grime, and Keybudz, which offers a reusable kit that includes different brush head attachments that can also be used to clean other devices. That said, you may not need an entire kit, but suitable tools will make things easier.
You should always use the gentlest cleaning equipment before going ham with rubbing alcohol or a metallic tool. Doing so will reduce the chances of damaging your headphones’ often glossy plastic casing and lessen the chances of damaging the delicate membranes that many buds (and some eartips) have. I speak from experience, having perforated two AirPod membranes due to over-enthusiastic cleaning. Even when removing the tips, take care: With Sony’s WF-1000XM5, you need to twist and pull them off. Just follow the manufacturers’ guidance (we list several guides below), along with our best tips below.
How to keep your wireless earbuds clean
Now your buds are looking pristine, try to keep them looking that way. If you’re using your AirPods or Galaxy Buds during your workouts, wipe them down with a cloth afterward to reduce the chances of moisture getting inside. The more frequently you check on the state of your wireless earbuds, the easier they are to clean.
We’ll finish this guide with a little bit of digital hygiene: make sure any companion TWE apps are up-to-date. These updates can sometimes add notable new features or improve performance. Your smartphone will usually transmit firmware updates to your earbuds automatically after OS and app updates, so make sure you keep them nearby to your phone. This is especially true with iPhones and AirPods, which will not notify you when firmware updates are available. Check that you’ve got the latest version of the firmware in iOS settings (you probably do), and if it’s not up-to-date, make sure both your iPhone and AirPods are plugged into power and (crucially) near each other. The update should be beamed to the AirPods pretty quickly, but you can also leave the devices next to each other overnight to ensure the update happens.
Whether you want to back up the data on your PC, transfer videos from your Mac or offload a few games from your PlayStation 5, a portable SSD is a quick and easy way to expand your storage. These little bricks may cost more than traditional hard drives, but they’re significantly faster, lighter and more reliable. Figuring out the best portable SSD for you, though, isn’t as simple as just picking the one with the lowest price or the most space. (Well, it can be, but that wouldn’t be very efficient.) To help, we’ve weeded through the portable SSD market, tested a bunch of contenders and sorted out which ones offer the most value. You can find our top picks below, plus an overview of what to know before you buy.
Table of contents
Best external SSDs for 2025
Photo by Jeff Dunn / Engadget
Capacities: 1TB, 2TB, 4TB | Size: 2.56 x 1.97 x 0.39 inches | Weight: 1.34 ounces | USB interface: USB 3.2 Gen 2 | Controller/bridge chip: Silicon Motion SM2320 | NAND type: TLC | Rated maximum sequential speeds: 1,050 MB/s read, 1,050 MB/s write | Warranty: Five years
The Crucial X9 Pro finished at or just under the top in each of our benchmarks relative to its speed class, and it stayed noticeably cooler than most of the other drives we tested after extended use. It’s a USB 3.2 Gen 2 model, so it’s slower than alternatives based on Thunderbolt, USB4 or USB 3.2 Gen 2×2, but it costs less, and it’s still quick enough for the non-professional tasks most people do with a portable SSD. Ports that can actually utilize USB 3.2 Gen 2 speeds tend to be more ubiquitous on mainstream computers, too. This isn’t the cheapest 10 Gbps drive around, but it’s in the same ballpark as its peers and isn’t too expensive. As of this writing, a 1TB model is available for $95, though it often goes for less. (We’ve seen it fall as low as $60 in the past.) 2TB and 4TB versions are also available.
Besides its relatively speedy performance, the X9 Pro stands out for being so tiny. Its aluminum case is shorter than a credit card and easy to fit in a pocket, weighing in at just 1.34 ounces. The whole thing is IP55-rated, so it’ll survive dust and water splashes, and it’s backed with a five-year warranty, which is a couple years longer than some alternatives.
Our only real complaints are that the included USB-C cable is small and there’s no adapter for USB-A ports in the box. And while the X9 Pro can utilize 256-bit , Micron (Crucial’s parent company) hasn’t released its own password protection tool to take full advantage of it. We’ll also note that there’s a cheaper non-”Pro” X9, but that one uses QLC flash, so it’s not as durable or fast (especially with sustained writes). The X9 Pro is the better buy.
Pros
Great performance for its speed class
Rugged and super compact form factor
Stays relatively cool with extended use
Five-year warranty
Cons
There are cheaper 10 Gbps drives
Included USB-C cable is short, and there’s no USB-A cable in the box
Capacities: 1TB, 2TB | Size: 2.74 x 1.28 x 0.53 inches | Weight: 1.01 ounces | USB interface: USB 3.2 Gen 2 | Controller/bridge chip: Silicon Motion SM2320 | NAND type: TLC | Rated maximum sequential speeds: 1,050 MB/s read, 1,000 MB/s write | Warranty: Five years
The Kingston XS1000 performs similarly to the Crucial X9 Pro but often retails for less, so it’s a good alternative if you want to save some cash. A 1TB model is available for $75 as we write this, which is $20 less than the X9 Pro, while the 2TB version is down to $120, which is a roughly $30 drop. There’s no 4TB option, though.
At those prices, the XS1000 is a good value for everyday backups and transfers. It kept up with or slightly edged the X9 Pro across our benchmarks: In our custom file transfer test, for example, its reads were a second faster, while its writes were only six seconds slower. (The two drives appear to have comparable internals and are based on a similar controller — the Silicon Power SM2320G — so this may not be a huge surprise.) It topped every USB 3.2 Gen 2 drive we tested in 3DMark’s gaming storage benchmark as well. It’s slightly thicker than the X9 Pro but still wonderfully portable, with its stubby rectangular design weighing just over an ounce. Like the Crucial drive, it’s backed by a five-year warranty.
Where Kingston’s model falls behind Crucial’s X9 Pro is in the extras. There’s no formal IP or drop ratings, so we wouldn’t feel as comfortable chucking it around on the go. It lacks hardware-based encryption, and it only comes with a USB-C to A cable, so you’ll need to supply your own adapter if your laptop only has USB-C ports. It doesn’t stay quite as cool as the X9 Pro with continuous use, and its sustained write performance isn’t as fast either, so it’s worth paying up if you plan to regularly copy hundreds of gigabytes to the SSD (and can’t just get a higher-class model). For the money, though, all of this may be easier to overlook.
Pros
Faster than most 10 Gbps drives we tested
Aggressively priced
Highly portable
Five-year warranty
Cons
No formal water-resistance or drop protection
No USB-C to C cable in the box
Only available in 1TB or 2TB
Slower sustained write performance than X9 Pro with very large files
Capacities: 1TB, 2TB, 4TB | Size: 4.13 x 2.52 x 0.62 inches (with fan off), 4.82 x 2.52 x 0.62 inches (with fan on) | Weight: 6.4 ounces | USB interface: USB4 (40 Gbps) | Controller/bridge chip: Asmedia ASM2464PD | NAND type: TLC | Rated maximum sequential speeds: 3,800 MB/s read, 3,700 MB/s write | Warranty: Five years
If you’re a media editor, IT professional or just an enthusiast willing to pay for a significantly faster portable SSD, get the . It uses the newer USB4 interface and blew away every non-40 Gbps drive we tested across our benchmark tests.
In AmorphousDiskMark, for example, the Crucial X9 Pro delivered sequential reads and writes around 1,015 MB/s and 950 MB/s, respectively; with the SE920, those were about 3,350 MB/s and 3,125 MB/s. In our custom mixed file transfer test, we were able to move our 70GB folder to our MacBook in 32 seconds; with the X9 Pro, that process averaged about 81 seconds. Writing the folder to the drive, meanwhile, was about 30 seconds faster. If you’re buying an external SSD to move around large chunks of data, this kind of leap adds up.
The drive itself is significantly bigger and thicker than either of our picks above, but it’s not so large that we’d call it unwieldy. It’s about the size of a deck of cards, so it’ll fit better in a bag than a pants pocket. Beyond that, the brushed metal exterior feels crisp to the touch, and ADATA supports the device with a five-year warranty.
That said, this thing can get seriously hot. The design includes a built-in micro fan to help dissipate heat, which you activate just by clicking the case down; that’s clever, but it’s not enough to keep the drive cool on its own. All of this comes at a price premium, too, with a 1TB model currently available for $180. But if performance is the only thing that matters to you, it should be worthwhile.
Pros
Blazingly fast 40 Gbps performance
Slick metal enclosure
Smaller than other USB4 and Thunderbolt SSDs we tested
The pre-built OWC Express 1M2 is a premium-feeling USB4 SSD that’s roughly as fast as the ADATA SE920, but it’s larger and significantly more expensive as of this writing.
If you’re in the relatively small group with a PC that supports USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 but not Thunderbolt or USB4, the Crucial X10 Pro is essentially a faster version of our top pick. The Lexar SL600 is a larger but slightly quicker option, while the Lexar SL500, Kingston XS2000 or Samsung T9 could also work if you see them on discount. As a reminder, though, drives like these are aimed primarily at content creators and other professionals, and you have to make sure you won’t upgrade to a device with a faster USB interface anytime soon.
The Samsung T7 Shield has a conveniently rugged design with a rubberized, IP65-rated shell. It also comes with both USB-C and USB-A cables. But it was consistently slower than the X9 Pro and XS1000 in our benchmark tests, plus it has a shorter three-year warranty.
The Silicon Power PX10 is an especially affordable USB 3.2 Gen 2 model. Its peak speeds weren’t too far off the X9 Pro or XS1000 in synthetic benchmarks, but it can get distractingly hot and its sustained writes are markedly worse. It took 50 seconds longer to move our 70GB custom test folder to this drive compared to the X9 Pro, for example.
The Crucial X6 is another low-cost option that’s a good bit slower than our top picks. It’s limited to a three-year warranty and lacks an IP rating as well. It’s not a terrible option for the basics, but there’s little reason to get it over the XS1000 when their prices are similar.
The OWC Envoy Pro FX is well-built and supports Thunderbolt 3 and USB 3.2 Gen 2, but it’s a smidge slower than the SE920 and Express 1M2, and it’s much pricier than the former.
The Samsung T9 portable SSD. (Samsung)
What to consider before buying an external SSD
Capacity
The first thing to figure out before buying a portable SSD is just how much storage space you need. Most of the drives we considered for this guide are available in capacities ranging from one to four terabytes, though plenty of smaller and larger options exist.
There’s no hard-and-fast rule for which size is “best” — that’ll ultimately depend on your budget and what exactly you’re looking to stash. But in general, it’s better to overcompensate than underdo it. Nobody wants to be forced into buying a second drive because they filled the first one up too quickly. If you’re backing up a PC, a good rule of thumb is to buy an external SSD with twice as much space as your computer’s internal storage. This way, you can save at least one full backup while also having room for additional data. If you want to store a bunch of PlayStation or Xbox games with huge install sizes, you may need more space. If you just want to back up a small collection of files, you may be better off saving your cash and just getting a smaller USB flash drive instead, which aren’t quite the same as the external SSDs we tested for this guide.
Price
In general, you get a better price-per-gigabyte ratio the further you go up the capacity ladder. As of this writing, the 1TB Samsung T9 is priced at $130, or $0.13 per gigabyte (GB), while the 4TB version is available for $297 or $0.07 per GB. That technically makes the larger model a better “value,” but not everyone needs to pay that much more upfront.
SSDs in the same speed class tend to not vary too wildly in terms of performance, so part of our decision-making for this guide came down to which ones are often the cheapest. But prices can fluctuate over time; if you see that one of our top picks is priced way higher than a comparable honorable mention, feel free to get the latter. At this point in time, costs are broadly trending upwards.
The ADATA SE920 portable SSD connected to an Apple MacBook Pro. (Photo by Jeff Dunn / Engadget)
Speed and USB interface
Just about all external SSDs are significantly faster than mechanical hard disk drives (HDDs), so you’ll save time waiting for files to transfer and games to load no matter what. Within the market, however, there are distinct performance tiers. These are defined in large part by the USB interface a drive supports. While all of the SSDs we considered for this guide can connect over USB-C, some USB-C connections can supply faster transfer speeds than others. Sorting through this can get real confusing real fast, so we’ll try to put it in simple terms.
You can essentially divide today’s crop of portable SSDs into different segments. At the very top are drives that utilize the (relatively) new Thunderbolt 5 standard, which has a theoretical maximum transfer rate of 80 gigabits per second (Gbps). (You may see it advertise speeds up to 120 Gbps, but that boost doesn’t apply to storage devices.) But portable SSDs that support this tech only just started to trickle out toward the end of 2024, and the market for devices with Thunderbolt 5 ports is still fairly limited, with the most notable exceptions being Apple’s top-end Macs with a M4 Pro or M4 Max chip.
Thunderbolt 5 is built on a spec called USB4, which can technically reach up to 80 Gbps as well but is more typically available in a flavor that tops out at 40 Gbps. Portable SSDs based on that standard started to roll out toward the end of 2023 but are still relatively infrequent. The older Thunderbolt 3 and Thunderbolt 4, which other high-end external SSDs continue to use, support the same 40 Gbps maximum.
A third version of USB4, meanwhile, maxes at 20 Gbps, as does an older yet more frequently used standard called USB 3.2 Gen 2×2. Below that is USB 3.2 Gen 2, which maxes at 10 Gbps. Then there’s USB 3.2 Gen 1, which is capped at 5 Gbps. Lastly, we’ll bundle together SSDs that use older standards and aren’t worth considering here.
To make this easy: For everyday folks, a good USB 3.2 Gen 2 drive is the sweet spot between fast-enough performance, wide-enough compatibility and cheap-enough price, so those make up our primary recommendations above. If you work in a creative field or don’t mind paying extra to shave seconds off your large file transfers, though, a “higher-tier” model would make sense. However, note that actual computers that utilize USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 aren’t super common — no Mac supports it, for one — and the interface is effectively being replaced by USB4.
In general, your chain is only as strong as its weakest link: If your computer only has USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports, for example, you could still use a Thunderbolt SSD, but you won’t get beyond Gen 2 speeds. Make sure you know what you’re working with before you buy.
As a refresher, storage devices are broadly measured in terms of read and write speeds. The former refers to how long it takes to access something from the drive; the latter, how long it takes to save something to it. From there, you can break these metrics into sequential and random performance. Sequential speeds tend to matter more with portable SSDs, since most people use them to save or access long, constant streams of data such as a bunch of high-res photos. Random speeds would be important if you want to run video games off the drive, since that’d involve reading and writing smaller, more scattered files. Either way, how well an SSD can sustain its performance with extended use is also critical.
Other performance factors and enclosures
A modern portable SSD’s speeds aren’t just about its USB interface, though. Its performance can also depend on how advanced its controller is, whether it has a native USB flash controller or a separate bridge chip to communicate with a host device, the kind and quality of NAND flash memory it uses, whether it has a DRAM cache or it’s DRAM-less, and more.
We’re simplifying things, but here are some quick tips: Drives with triple-level cell (TLC) memory aren’t as cheap as quad-level cell (QLC) SSDs, but they’re generally more reliable and they offer better write performance. Having a dedicated DRAM cache helps if you plan to hit your drive with more intense, sustained workloads, but may not be worth the extra cost for most people. Some models with native flash controllers may not perform as well as those with a bridging chip, depending on the SSD inside, but they typically draw less heat and are physically smaller. All of this is to say that an external SSD’s speeds aren’t quite as straightforward as what the manufacturer chooses to advertise on the box.
It’s also worth remembering that you can turn an internal SSD into a portable solution with a good enclosure. If you have a spare drive and don’t mind going the DIY route, this can be a cheaper and more flexible solution, though we’ve stuck to pre-built models for this guide for the sake of simplicity.
Photo by Jeff Dunn / Engadget
Size, durability, endurance and warranty
Most portable SSDs are impressively small and light, so they won’t be difficult to tuck in a bag (or even a pocket) and take on the go. We note above if any drive is bulkier than usual.
Nothing we’re talking about matters if your drive can’t last in the long term. It’s hard to definitively say which external SSDs are the most reliable, but we scoured through user reviews and feedback while researching this guide to ensure none of our picks show a pattern of catastrophic errors. If there was too much smoke around a particular model, we steered clear. We ruled out certain drives from SanDisk and Western Digital, for instance, after reports from Ars Technica and The Vergenoted an issue that led to data loss (and lawsuits) in 2023.
That said, one of the big reasons you’d buy an SSD in general is its superior durability. Because it has no moving mechanical parts inside, an SSD has far fewer avenues to failure than an external hard drive. You still don’t want to be careless with them, but an accidental drop shouldn’t be the end of the world.
Some portable SSDs build on this inherent ruggedness with plastic or rubberized casings and more robust waterproofing. These aren’t necessary for everyone, but if you’re a frequent traveler or someone who often works outdoors, there are options for you.
Still, all drives can fail. If you have any sort of data you’d be distraught to lose, you should back it up regularly, then make a second backup, ideally with a cloud service. Along those protective lines, we also took note of the warranty policy for each drive we tested. Just about all of them are backed for either three or five years; of course, longer is better.
Encryption and software
It’s not uncommon to store sensitive data on a portable SSD, so some models offer extra security features like hardware-based encryption — i.e., direct scrambling of data stored on the drive itself — built-in keypads and fingerprint readers to protect against unauthorized access if the drive is lost or stolen. While not top requirements, perks like these are certainly good to have. Some SSDs also come with companion software to further manage the drive. The best of those can be handy to have around, but we wouldn’t call them essential.
How we test external SSDs
Unfortunately, we did not have access to a device that can make full use of USB 3.2 Gen 2, USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 and Thunderbolt/USB4 speeds interchangeably, so we had to split our testing across multiple devices, including an M1 Pro MacBook Pro and an Alienware gaming PC running Windows 11. Because of this, we primarily compared the portable SSDs within each “class” against one another. Before switching OSes, we reformatted each drive to each platform’s standard file system format: APFS for macOS and NTFS for Windows.
After researching which SSDs had enough positive feedback to be worth testing in the first place, we put 13 drives through a range of synthetic and “real-world” benchmark tests. On Windows, these included CrystalDiskMark, PCMark 10’s Data Drive Benchmark and 3DMark’s gaming-focused Storage Benchmark. On macOS, we used AmorphousDiskMark (effectively a Mac version of CrystalDiskMark), BlackMagic Disk Speed Test and ATTO Disk Benchmark.
We also timed how long it took for each drive to read and write a custom 70GB folder filled with roughly 11,500 different files, including photos, videos, music files, PDFs and other large and small data types scattered across numerous subfolders. We performed multiple passes for each test to avoid irregularities, and we kept track of each SSD’s heat levels over the course of the whole suite. Our process wasn’t a perfect science, but it gave us a general sense of how each drive compares to other models in its price and performance range.
Recent updates
February 2025: We’ve checked to ensure the pricing info and links in this guide are still accurate. We’ve also added details on the (relatively) new Thunderbolt 5 interface, which has been implemented in a couple recent portable SSDs like the OWC Envoy Ultra and LaCie Rugged SSD Pro5. We’ll look to include testing notes for those for our next update, as they should be faster than the ADATA SE920, our current premium pick, albeit for a much higher price. For now, though, our top picks remain the same.
October 2024: We’ve taken a sweep through this guide to ensure all pricing and availability info is still correct. Our recommendations are unchanged.
Apple redesigned the Mail app on iPhones with the release of iOS 18.2 update back in December, but strangely skipped the treatment for iPads and Macs. The company has finally made a course correction with the macOS 15.4 and iPad OS 18.4 developer beta updates, which are now available for testers.
The biggest change introduced by the new Mail app are categories. All your emails are now neatly slotted across four categories. Here’s a brief breakdown of how it works:
Primary: For personal messages and time-sensitive content.
Transactions: A section for keeping a tab on confirmation emails, receipts, and shipping-related alerts.
Updates: All the content that you’ve signed up to receive via an email agreement, such as news, newsletters, and social media updates.
Promotions: This is the section where you get marketing and shopping material, such as coupons and sales-related notifications.
Apple, however, notes that if any of your emails across the last three categories contain time-sensitive details, they will appear in the Primary bracket. Apple is also taking an approach similar to social media profiles, when you open messages from a specific sender within these three categories.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
“When you tap a Transactions, Updates, or Promotions message, a digest view of messages from that sender opens,” says the company. This is a great way to catch up on activities such as alerts from your banking service provider, as you see all your payments neatly slotted in a vertically-scrolling card-like format.
Of course, you can always choose to disable categories and enable the classic list view that shows all your emails in the same order as they landed in your inbox. The idea is neat, as it separates unimportant jargon from relevant communication, but it’s not perfect.
The arrival of the updated Mail experience on iPads and Macs solves a big problem, even though it add some versatility, like letting users create their own categories. iPhones have had the new interface for a while now, and if you got used to it, not having a consistent experience on your Mac or iPad was a bummer.
With the arrival of macOS 15.4 and iPadOS 18.4’s first developer beta updates, there is finally some respite. It’s now only a matter of time before the developer and public beta testing comes to an end, and the overhauled Mail experience is available across the entire mobile and desktop ecosystem.
As far as other AI-powered tricks in the Mail app are concerned, Mac users can also take advantage of email summaries, smart replies, and priority messages.
Buried in a garbage dump in Wales, U.K., is a hard drive containing Bitcoin worth a colossal $765 million, according to computer engineer James Howells.
Howells accidentally discarded the smartphone-sized drive in 2013, but his local council has repeatedly refused him permission to enter the landfill site and search for it, citing factors such as environmental concerns and arguments over who is the lawful owner of the device now that it’s part of the dump.
But there’s been a new twist in this long-running story, as Newport Council recently revealed that it’s planning to close down the site in the next 12 months so that it can transform it into a solar farm to power the council’s new garbage trucks. The decision to close it has given Howells a new idea for how he might be able to get hold of his much-missed hard drive.
“I would be potentially interested in purchasing the landfill site,” he said in comments reported by the BBC this week. “I have discussed this option recently with investment partners and it is very much on the table.”
The entire site is filled with more than 1.4 million tons of waste, and Howells thinks the hard drive is in an area containing around 100,000 tons of it.
To find the drive and its 8,000 Bitcoins, Howells said he would deploy a team of human sorters, robot dogs, and an AI-powered machine that’s capable of identifying a hard drive as it passes by on a conveyor belt. But if the drive has suffered damage, there’s a chance he won’t be able to ever recover his precious Bitcoins.
But if the endeavor succeeded, Howells has said he would keep around 30% of the Bitcoins for himself, with 30% going to the recovery team, 30% to investors, and the remainder shared among local causes and Newport residents.
Digital Trends reported on Howells’ lost hard drive in 2020, when the Bitcoin on it was valued at $75 million, around $700 million less than what it’s worth now.
Howells told Business Insider in 2022 that he tries not to think too much about what his share of the money will enable him to do if he ever recovers it, “otherwise you just drive yourself crazy.”
It looks like I may have played myself again. I was genuinely excited about AMD’s RX 9070 XT, but now, I’m starting to worry about its future. I always knew that the new AMD flagship wouldn’t be able to compete against some of Nvidia’s best graphics cards, but I had a lot of hope that it’d still be a great competitor for a number of other reasons.
I’m not doubting the performance of the RX 9070 XT. I have no reason to, as we don’t know a thing about it — and that’s exactly why I’m worried. Not only are the GPUs still a complete mystery, but they’ve also reportedly been delayed. At this rate, I fear that AMD may have lost the war before it even started, and I’m not alone.
I felt pretty excited for the RX 9070 XT, but so far, the launch of RDNA 4 has been a harsh lesson in managing your expectations.
Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
First, the GPUs barely got a mention during AMD’s 45-minute-long CES 2025 keynote. Then, the few slides that AMD released to the press offered very little information; we basically only learned a little bit about the RDNA 4 architecture and AMD’s performance goals. The information was vague, too — think “improved ray tracing performance” and the like.
The GPUs themselves were spotted at CES, but only those made by AMD’s partners, and they didn’t come with any specifications. So, at this stage, it’s been revealed that the RX 9070 XT comes with three fans in its Gigabyte design. That’s… not a lot.
But wait — there’s hope, or so I thought. AMD told Digital Trends that RDNA 4 would be released “in a matter of weeks,” and that the company thought that the new RX 9000 series deserved its own event. But only silence has followed.
The first update came not from AMD itself, but from B&H. The retailer put the RX 9070 XT up for sale with a January 22 preorder date. The cards had been taken down, but then they reappeared with a release date of March 22. Finally, this tracks.
Radeon 9000 series hardware and software are looking great and we are planning to have a wide assortment of cards available globally. Can’t wait for gamers to get their hands on the cards when they go on sale in March!
David McAfee, AMD’s vice president and general manager of the Ryzen CPU and Radeon graphics division, revealed on X (Twitter) that the cards will go on sale in March. McAfee later added that AMD is holding onto the GPUs a little while longer in order to optimize their software stack, including FSR 4.
Meanwhile, various leakers and tipsters are having a field day with AMD’s troubled RDNA 4 launch. Recent whispers point to AMD still holding off to see how Nvidia fares. At this rate, AMD will likely get to see the RTX 5070 Ti and the RTX 5070 in their full glory before it launches the RX 9070 XT.
AMD wanted to announce its new graphics cards alongside Nvidia, but it clearly didn’t have a solid plan for actually releasing them. Now, we’ve had to cobble together various ideas about the cards from leaks, board partners, and social media posts, which doesn’t inspire a lot of confidence.
As soon as I saw David McAfee announce that RDNA 4 wouldn’t be here until March, I knew what was coming — and I wasn’t wrong. PC gaming enthusiasts, including both AMD and Nvidia fans, weren’t happy with the way it’s all gone down.
Scrolling through the hundreds of comments under McAfee’s post reveals just how badly the general public wants to know what’s going on.
Not even, a proper announcement with slides of performance, features. Could be even "price will be reveled at, a later date". This is so bad PR… i have no words.
Sitting at over 500 likes, a comment from GawroskiT on X makes a dig at AMD’s PR team. “Not even a proper announcement. […] This is [such] bad PR. I have no words.”
Another user, PlaysRingle, promises to ditch AMD for Nvidia based on how things are going. “AMD is going to make me upgrade my RX 7900 XTX to an RTX 5080. I can’t keep defending AMD when it keeps doing these things.”
I know that I’m being fairly critical of AMD here myself, but I can’t help feeling bad when reading these comments and seeing the reactions. Some of it is really quite harsh, such as this comment from noremac258: “Does AMD ever not fail to capitalize on an opportunity? […] AMD’s graphics division is a disaster.”
What ARE you guys doing? What sort of "marketing" is this "stealth" reveal??? Your CES presence was so uninformative you'd have been better off not showing up at all, and all we get since then is THIS?
I tried to find more supportive comments, but there are very few of those to be found. However, Hardware Unboxed made a separate post defending AMD, which is what prompted McAfee to clarify that the delayed launch comes down to software optimization.
AMD delaying the launch of RDNA4 to March is the right move. The last thing they want is stuffing up the launch yet again, which they risk doing if they launch before Nvidia.
And very few people would have bought a 9070 XT just because it launched a week or two before the 5070.…
I know that X is a tough crowd, so I decided to check Reddit for more reactions. Long story short — it wasn’t pretty.
The comments under this post, sharing that RDNA 4 won’t arrive until March, are still harsh. One commenter said: “Nvidia’s release was looking rather underwhelming, so AMD had to pull out all the stops to make sure they miss the opportunity this time.”
“I perceive this as having no confidence in your own product. [AMD] had the opportunity here to seize this midrange market segment by coming out first,” said another user, pointing out that waiting for Nvidia’s RTX 5070 might backfire.
In search of people who are more in favor of AMD than Nvidia, I ventured into the r/AMD community. This post quickly showed me that people aren’t willing to cut AMD any slack.
Other than the top comment thread pictured above, all the other highly-rated comments criticize AMD. “Absolute incompetence from AMD’s GPU division, again,” says one poster. “Doesn’t a significant amount of retailers already have the cards in stock? What a fumble,” adds another.
I could go on, but you get the gist. It’s clear that people aren’t pleased, and while the internet at large is hardly ever satisfied, some of this might’ve been avoided if AMD had been more forthcoming about the RX 9000 series. People are frustrated with the delay, but also with the lack of information.
AMD could still make the RX 9070 XT a success
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
Things are looking a little bleak for RDNA 4 right now, but the internet is quick to forget. It’s still entirely possible for AMD to turn this around and make the launch of the RX 9000 series a success.
My opinion is that sharing some information would be better than sharing next to none; even a basic spec sheet would go a long way. Although McAfee plays a key role in AMD’s GPU strategy, most fans don’t check his X account on a daily basis. Those people are either kept in the dark or they’re left to rely on third parties to tell them what’s going on.
Letting the general public figure out AMD’s plans based on social media means that a lot of people who might have otherwise been happy to wait will now be influenced by people who are decidedly not happy. If there are hundreds of comments all saying that AMD is doing a bad job, it’s easy to start believing it yourself if you don’t have anyone telling you otherwise.
Unfortunately, right now, AMD is really not doing much to dispel that notion. A quick X post, even when coming from an AMD executive, doesn’t cut it.
Aside from some marketing efforts to drive up the hype, I think it’s now more important than ever for AMD to lean into that performance-per-dollar metric that makes GPUs like Intel’s Arc B580 such a great deal. The fact is that the RX 9070 XT might still be an exceptional GPU even if it won’t be able to beat all of its Nvidia rivals.
Most people won’t be spending $2,000 (or more) on an RTX 5090. The GPU market needs graphics cards that provide value while being able to run the latest games, and to that end, AMD’s usually done a pretty good job. Strangely enough, some of its best GPUs are the ones that didn’t get a lot of love from the marketing department, such as the RX 7900 GRE — but that’s no reason for the RX 9070 XT to also be launched with so little fanfare.
In the consumer graphics market, AMD is a small fish; Nvidia is a massive shark. Following a troubled launch, AMD may therefore now face an uphill climb with the RX 9070 XT — but I’m still hopeful.
If AMD gets the pricing right, the RX 9070 XT might still turn out to be an amazing card. On the other hand, if it’s too expensive when compared to its Nvidia rivals, it might end up being overlooked regardless of AMD’s marketing efforts. And let’s hope that those efforts actually begin soon, because so far, Nvidia’s winning the battle — but AMD could still walk away unscathed from the war.
“The Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 is a very fast workstation, but it has some significant downsides for the cost.”
Pros
Excellent productivity performance
Strong creativity performance
Wide range of options
Solid build quality
Tons of ports
Cons
Extremely expensive
Thick and heavy
Poor review display quality
Touchpad is too small
We don’t typically review laptops like the ThinkPad P16 Gen 2. It exists in a category solely for creative professionals working at large organizations — a commercial PC designed with performance in mind above all else.
I was curious though: How does this stack up against more mainstream devices? I’ve reviewed a number of laptops over the last few months aimed at balancing efficiency and performance in thin-and-light chassis. A few are legitimate contenders to make our list of the best laptops, but none provide the kind of performance that gamers and creators require.
Are one of those a better option for IT departments than a traditional workstation like the Lenovo ThinkPad P16 Gen 2? After all, it’s thick and heavy, but it packs in more powerful components aimed purely at speeding through demanding workflows and with some gaming thrown in. You won’t want to lug it around, and while the ThinkPad P16 delivers its promised performance, it just costs too much for almost everyone.
Nvidia RTX A1000 Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Nvidia RTX 2000 Ada Nvidia RTX 3500 Ada Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada Nvidia RTX 5000 Ada
RAM
32GB 64GB 128GB 192GB
Display
16.0-inch 16:10 4K+ (3840 x 2400) IPS, 60Hz 16.0-inch 16:10 4K+ (3840 x 2400) OLED 60Hz, 16.0-inch 16:10 QHD+ (2560 x 1600) IPS, 165Hz 16.0-inch 16:10 FHD+ (1920 x 1200) IPS, 60Hz
Storage
Up to 2x 4TB SSD
Touch
No
Ports
2 x USB-C with Thunderbolt 4 1 x USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 2 x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 1 x HDMI 2.1 1 x 3.5mm audio jack 1 x SD card reader
Wireless
Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3
Webcam
1080p with infrared camera for Windows 11 Hello facial recognition
Operating system
Windows 11
Battery
94 watt-hour
Price
$2,519+
As is often the case with laptops offering a ton of configuration options, it’s not always possible to buy every given combination at a given point in time. As of right now, the $2,619 base model has an Intel Core i7-14700HX CPU, 32GB of RAM, a 1TB SSD, an Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada GPU, and a 16.0-inch FHD+ IPS display.
My review unites has the same CPU, RAM, and storage but upgrades to an RTX 4000 Ada GPU and a QHD+ IPS display, and it’s priced at a whopping $5,614. The biggest jump is in the GPU, which by itself adds $1,560 to the price. The most expensive model is a truly stratospheric $10,453 with a Core i9-13980HX, 192GB of RAM, two 4TB SSDs in RAID 1, an RTX 5000 Ada GPU, and a 4K+ OLED display. Again, the GPU upgrade is very expensive at $3,050 over the base model and the RAM adds $1,120.
Those are very expensive prices, no matter how you cut it. You’re getting a laptop that’s designed to meet the very exacting requirements of applications like AutoCAD where rock-solid reliability is vital, and you’re paying a premium for that level of certification. If you don’t care about that, then you can get an equally powerful gaming laptop like the Lenovo Legion 9i Gen 9 for less, or even an Apple MacBook Pro 16 that can get quite expensive, but not this expensive.
Design
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends
I was a little shocked when I pulled the ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 out of the box, because it’s so much larger than any laptop we’ve reviewed in a long time. This is a proper mobile workstation, through and through.
It’s larger even than most gaming laptops, particularly in its 1.2-inch thickness and 6.5 pound weight. The Asus ProArt P16 is another powerful laptop aimed at creators, and it’s considerably smaller even with its own large 16-inch display. Not only is it thinner and shallower but it’s a lot thinner at a maximum of 0.68 inches and lighter at 4.08 pounds. The last gaming laptop we reviewed, the Lenovo Legion 9i Gen 9, is roughly as large in width and depth but thinner at 0.89 inches and lighter at 5.51 pounds.
Those two are also very powerful machines with great performance, so it’s a little harder to justify the ThinkPad P16’s sheer size. My wife uses an Alienware M16 that’s also very powerful, and it feels a lot smaller. But the ThinkPad P16 does offer a great thermal design that moves a lot of air around, and it’s more expandable than many laptops with the ability to equip dual SSDs for faster storage performance. And Lenovo built the laptop to achieve Independent Software Vendor (ISV) certification, which relies on stable performance to ensure reliability for professionals. But is the ThinkPad P16 too big? I think it might be.
It’s also constructed of plastic with glass fiber on the outside, with a magnesium shell internally. It’s quite robust, with no bending, flexing, or twisting in the lid, keyboard deck, or bottom chassis. But it doesn’t feel the same as many other laptops in the same price range. The Apple MacBook Pro 16 is an example of a laptop that exudes a feeling of higher quality, even if it’s no more robust than the Thinkpad P16. Probably, the plastic was used in part because it’s already 6.5 pounds, which is pretty heavy. If the chassis were all-metal, it would only be heavier.
The aesthetic is rather bland. Most laptops have a minimalist design today, with very little if any of the bling of several years ago. But the ThinkPad P16 takes that to an extreme, with almost no character whatsoever. It’s a dull gray with boring lines, and it’s only saved from being downright fugly by a couple of the usual ThinkPad splashes of red. It’s there in the dot on the “i” in the logos on the lid and palm rest and the TrackPoint nubbin embedded in the keyboard.
But it doesn’t follow either the old-school black-on-black ThinkPad aesthetic or their newer, more modern look. And then there’s a red strip along the lower edge of the back chassis. Gaming laptops and the MacBook Pro 16 are either more exciting or more elegant.
Keyboard and touchpad
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends
The ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 has Lenovo’s non-ThinkPad keyboard, oddly enough, which is shallower than the ThinkPad version but has the same large sculpted keycaps and lots of key spacing. The switches are light and snappy, although the bottoming action isn’t quite smooth enough to rank as one of my favorite keyboards. As usual, Apple’s Magic Keyboard remains at the top of my list.
The touchpad is a mechanical version that’s OK. There’s the TrackPoint nubbin embedded in the keyboard as a nod to ThinkPad fans, but its two buttons take up space from the touchpad. That makes the swiping surface even smaller.
Connectivity and webcam
As is usual with large laptops like this, there’s plenty of connectivity. There’s a mix of modern Thunderbolt 4 ports and legacy connections, along the side and the back of the chassis. The power connector is proprietary. Wireless connectivity is one generation behind.
The webcam is a 1080p version, so it meets the new standard. It’s fine. There’s no neural processing unit (NPU) on board, so the ThinkPad 16 can’t take advantage of today’s AI with a fast but efficient chip. The GPU can be used, though, and it will provide very fast AI processing at the cost of more power usage.
Performance
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends
The ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 uses Intel Raptor Lake CPUs in the 13th or 14th generations. That iteration has had some issues with instability that Intel has been working on, specifically those rated with a TDP of 64 watts or higher. That’s something to keep in mind. My review unit used the Core i7-14700HX, a 55-watt part with 20 cores (eight performance and 12 Efficient) and 28 threads, running at up to 5.5GHz Max Turbo frequency. It’s a fast and power-hungry chipset that provides very good performance for demanding creative and, e.g., engineering applications.
It also uses the Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada GPU, which is aimed at those professional applications and, as mentioned above, is ISV-certified and so it provides some assurance that its performance will be reliable. This part is the main difference that comes with a workstation product like this — you can’t find it on consumer mainstream laptops. The RTX 4000 Ada uses the latest CUDA, RT, and Tensor cores for fast performance and houses 20GB of GPU memory with advanced AV1 encoders. It’s not optimized for gaming, but it performs a lot like the GeForce RTX 4070 and in some cases like a 4080.
The ThinkPad P16 does very well against a variety of other machines Core Ultra Series 1 chipsets and the RTX 4070. It also kept up with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. It’s particularly fast in single-core tasks, and the RTX 4000 Ada churns through Cinebench R24.
Most telling among our benchmarks is the laptop’s performance in the Pugetbench Premiere Pro benchmark that runs in a live version of Adobe’s Premiere Pro and can utilize the GPU for faster performance. It’s one of the fastest laptops we’ve tested, coming in behind the MacBook Pro 16 with various CPU optimizations that help out but GPU cores that aren’t quite as fast. Note that I included results from the MacBook Pro 16 with the previous-gen M3 Max; the M4 Max was recently released and is likely to be even faster.
Simply put, the ThinkPad P16 is a very fast laptop for professionals, and it can be even faster with a Core i9 CPU and an RTX 5000 Ada GPU that rivals the GeForce RTX 4090. Whether it’s fast enough given the high price comes down more to whether you need an ISV-certified laptop because your livelihood depends on rock-solid reliability.
When you have a laptop with these kinds of components, you’ll naturally want to consider playing some games. The RTX 4000 Ada isn’t aimed at gaming and it doesn’t use the standard Nvidia gaming-oriented drivers. But even so, it’s a capable gaming GPU.
To begin with, it scores 15,993 in the 3DMark Time Spy benchmark, which is faster than the usual RTX 4070 score of around 11,000. In fact, the Alienware M16 with an RTX 4080 scored 17,659 in this benchmark while the Legion 9i Gen 9 with the RTX 4090 score 20,293. That places the ThinkPad P16 closer to the RTX 4080 — at least, in this synthetic benchmark.
Looking at a couple of real-life gaming benchmarks paints a similar picture. The ThinkPad P16 hit 102 frames per second (fps) in Assassin’s Creed Valhalla at 1600p and ultra-high graphics. That’s a bit slower than the 114 fps hit by the Asus ProArt P16 with its RTX 4070. In Cyberpunk 2077, the Thinkpad P16 managed 74 fps at 1600p and ultra graphics with FSR 2.1 enabled, compared to the Legion 9i Gen 9 at 106 fps. So, the RTX 4090 is a lot faster. With ray tracing turned on, the ThinkPad P16 hit 60 fps compared to the Legion 9i Gen 9’s 88 fps.
Ultimately, you’ll be able to run modern titles at 1600p with graphics turned up at least as well as an RTX 4070.
Battery life
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends
There’s a large 94 watt-hour battery packed into the ThinkPad P16, but also some power-hungry components and a large, reasonably high-res display. You don’t expect great battery life from a laptop like this, and you don’t get it.
I saw just 4.25 hours in our web browsing test and around five hours in our video looping test. Those are pretty bad, but then I got just 42 minutes in our Cinebench R24 test that runs the CPU at full speed. That means you’ll need to carry around the very heavy power brick to get any real work done away from your office. That makes for well over 7 pounds to carry around, making this a less-than-portable solution.
Display and audio
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends
Lenovo offers several display options for the ThinkPad P16, all 16.0 inches in the 16:10 aspect ratio. You can get FHD+ (1920 x1200) IPS, QHD+ (2560 x 1800) IPS, 4K+ (3840 x 2400) IPS, and 4K+ OLED. The QHD+ IPS panel, which was on my review unit, runs at up to 165Hz, while the rest are limited to the more pedestrian 60Hz. I think QHD+ is just sharp enough at this display size, although I prefer 4K+ for the sharpest text. Subjectively, the display was good but not great — but I’m very spoiled by reviewing so many excellent OLED and mini-LED displays that are spectacular out of the box.
When I tested the display with my colorimeter, I ran into some issues. Lenovo includes the X-Rite Color Assistant utility to select various factory calibrations, and none of them provided very good results. The best result came from the “Not calibrated” setting, and those weren’t very good at all for a laptop intended for professionals who tend to demand a display with wide and accurate colors. Those results were very poor, at 99% of sRGB, 76% of AdobeRGB, and 77% of DCI-P3, which are just average for IPS displays today. Color accuracy was terrible, at a Delta-E of 7.19, and Gamma was way too bright at 1.7 (2.2 is standard and the vast majority of today’s displays hit that value).
The display was bright at 498 nits and contrast was good at 1,100:1. But no matter which calibration I selected, the colors were just unacceptable. The worst value came with the Rec. 709 setting that’s supposed to be optimized for video work, at a Delta-E of 11.88. That just won’t cut it. That’s bad enough that there may something wrong with my review unit, but that’s the data I collected from my colorimeter.
Lenovo may just need to do some work on those settings or my review unit might just be a dud. But when you spend this kind of money for a laptop, you expect better. I’m sure the 4K+ OLED display is excellent, and that would certainly be my choice if I bought the ThinkPad P16.
Audio is provided by two upward-firing speakers, and there’s plenty of volume with clear mids and highs. But bass is lacking, so you’ll want a pair of headphones or a Bluetooth speaker for anything more than YouTube videos and system sounds.
A laptop that you’ll only want if you really need it
Professional workstations like the ThinkPad P16 Gen 2 are invariably expensive because of the engineering needed to be ISV-certified, and professionals who rely on them to get paid can justify the price to gain the highest possible level of reliability. They’re not always the fastest options unless you’re using an application that takes direct advantage of the capabilities of a specific component.
The ThinkPad P16 is definitely very expensive, and it’s likely very reliable for that select group of buyers. The performance of the commercial GPU is also really impressive. But it’s also almost unreasonably thick and heavy, and it’s not that much faster than less-costly alternatives (or at all). Meanwhile, the display on my review unit was very disappointing. Even those who demand ISV certification can likely find a better alternative.
A budget of $1,000 usually isn’t enough for a fantastic gaming machine, but Walmart is making it happen with this offer for the iBuyPower Y40. The gaming desktop, which is powered by the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 graphics card, is currently available for only $999, following a $601 discount on its sticker price of $1,600. This is one of the most attractive gaming PC deals that we’ve found in recent memory, even with Black Friday less than a month behind us, so you’re going to want to take advantage of it before the stock is sold out.
Why you should buy the iBuyPower Y40 gaming PC
The iBuyPower Y40 gaming PC is packed with components that will let you play the best PC games without any issues. In addition to the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 graphics card, it’s equipped with the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 processor and 16GB of RAM, which is the best place to start for a gaming desktop according to our guide on how much RAM do you need. The gaming PC also comes with a liquid-cooling system, so it won’t suffer from overheating if your gaming sessions last for several hours at a time.
The 1TB SSD of the iBuyPower Y40 gaming PC provides enough storage space for several AAA titles, and it comes with Windows 11 Home out of the box. That means you can start downloading and installing your favorite games right after setting up the gaming desktop with your gaming monitor. Your purchase of the iBuyPower Y40 will also get you a gaming keyboard and gaming mouse, which match the gaming PC’s aesthetic with its tempered glass case and internal RGB lighting.
For a pre-built gaming PC that focuses on delivering excellent performance without going overboard on price, check out the iBuyPower Y40. It’s originally sold for $1,600, but it will be yours for $999 after Walmart’s $601 discount. We’re not sure how much time is remaining for you to be able to buy this machine for less than $1,000, but if you think the iBuyPower Y40 gaming PC is perfect for your needs, we highly recommend pushing through with the transaction immediately so you don’t miss out on the savings.
AMD and NVIDIA could be on a collision course for CES. AMD CEO Lisa Su has confirmed for the first time that the company is set to release its next-gen PC GPUs early next year.
“In gaming graphics, revenue declined year-over-year as we prepare for a transition to our next-gen Radeon GPUs based on our RDNA 4 architecture,” Su told investors on AMD’s third-quarter earnings call. “In addition to a strong increase in gaming performance, RDNA 4 delivers significantly higher ray-tracing performance and adds new AI capabilities. We are on track to launch the first RDNA 4 GPUs in early 2025.”
The timing very much suggests that AMD will reveal those RDNA 4-based graphics cards at CES in early January. It’s rare for the company to unveil desktop GPUs at the trade show (laptop cards are generally the order of the day for AMD at that event). However, it’s widely expected that NVIDIA will use its CES keynote to debut its next-gen 50-series GeForce RTX GPUs. We might get a little more clarity on that front when NVIDIA announces its own Q3 earnings results on November 19.
As PCWorld notes, AMD’s first RDNA 4 GPUs are expected to deliver mid-range performance at an equivalent price point in a bid to increase its market share. AMD’s gaming business (which includes the company’s GPU division) saw a 69 percent year-over-year drop in revenue to $462 million in Q3.
Intel recently introduced its new Core Ultra Series 2 chipsets, otherwise known as Lunar Lake, that are a part of Microsoft’s AI initiative caled Copilot+ PC. Its goal: to make longer-lasting Windows laptops that better compete with Apple’s very efficient MacBook lineup. But Intel isn’t alone, with Qualcomm also introducing new chipsets that also ramp up the efficiency of Windows laptops.
Two laptops are among the first to sport Lunar Lake, and both are from Asus. The Zenbook S 14 is a very good initial entrant, while the ExpertBook P5 is less expensive, but that’s about all. Read on to learn why the Zenbook is the better Lunar Lake representative and more likely to end up on our list of the best laptops.
2 x USB-C with Thunderbolt 4 1 x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 1 x HDMI 2.1 1 x 3.5mm headphone jack
1 x USB-C with Thunderbolt 4 1 x USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 1 x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 1 x HDMI 2.1 1 x 3.5mm headphone jack
Wireless
Wi-Fi 7 Bluetooth 5.4
Wi-Fi 6E Wi-Fi 7 Bluetooth 5.3 or 5.4
Webcam
1080p with infrared camera for Windows 11 Hello
1080p with infrared camera for Windows 11 Hello
Battery
72 watt-hour
63 watt-hour
Operating system
Windows 11
Windows 11
Price
$1,399+
$1,100+
Rating
4 out of 5 stars
2.5 out of 5 stars
The ExpertBook P5 costs has an attractive starting price of $1,100, which includes an Intel Core Ultra 5 226V chipset, 16 GB of RAM, a 512GB SSD, and a 14-inch QHD+ IPS display (the only option). I reviewed the higher-end version, which is $1,300 for a Core Ultra 7 258V, 32GB of RAM, and a 1TB SSD.
The Zenbook S 14 is more expensive, starting at $$1,500 for a similar configuration with a Core Ultra 7 258V, 32GB of RAM, a 1TB SSD, and a 14-inch 2.8K OLED display.
As we’ll see, while the ExpertBook P5 is less expensive, it’s not necessarily the better value.
Design
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends
The Zenbook S 14 follows Asus’ usual design for its premium consumer lineup. It uses an aluminum lid that’s been treated to act like a “high-tech ceramic,” which it calls “Ceraluminum.” That makes it very light and yet it remains very rigid. The lid has a texture that’s comfortable in hand. Its hinge is smooth and allows opening the lid with one hand. It looks great, with an attractive geometric design on the lid and a choice of either gray or white. It’s a sharp laptop.
The ExpertBook P5 is a lot less impressive. Its all-aluminum chassis is light enough, but it’s not as thin and the screen is surprisingly flexible. For a business-class machine, the ExpertBook just doesn’t give off the same quality feel. Its design is minimalistic and just fine, but it doesn’t have the sort of modern appeal of the Zenbook S 14. And its lid is too stiff when opening the laptop up. Simply put, it’s not nearly as nicely designed.
The Zenbook and ExpertBook have similar keyboards, although the Zenbook’s switches are snappier, while the ExpertBook gives more of an impression of bottoming out. They both have large keycaps and plenty of key spacing. Both also have mechanical touchpads, and neither is all that great. Haptic touchpads are preferable and increasingly common.
Connectivity is similar, although the ExpertBook P5 offers more legacy ports and the Zenbook an additional Thunderbolt 4 port. Both support the latest wireless connectivity, while the ExpertBook also offers the previous generation, likely to meet the needs of businesses.
Finally, both laptops have 1080p webcams with infrared cameras for Windows 11 Hello facial recognition. Both have equally fast Neural Processing Units (NPUs) for faster AI performance on-device.
Performance
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends
Both laptops use Intel’s latest Core Ultra Series 2 chipsets, specifically the Core Ultra 7 258V. This is an 8-core (four Performance and four Low Power Efficient), 8-thread chipset running at up to 4.8GHz. It’s a 17-watt chipset that can boost to 37 watts, putting it somewhere in between Intel’s Meteor Lake 15-watt U-series and 28-watt H-series chipsets. In addition, the chipset introduces Intel’s latest integrated Intel Arc 140V GPU, which falls somewhere in between the older Intel Arc and entry-level discrete GPUs.
According to our benchmarks, the two laptops perform similarly. The Zenbook S 14’s GPU performance is better, as is its single-core performance in Cinebench R24. But the differences wouldn’t be noticeable in practice. And while these results are slower than those from new chipsets from Qualcomm and AMD, they’re fast enough for even demanding productivity users. Neither laptop is better for gamers or creators.
Geekbench 6 (single/multi)
Cinebench R24 (single/multi/battery)
Handbrake
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Asus Zenbook S 14 (Core Ultra 7 258V / Intel Arc 140V)
The Zenbook S 14 uses a 14.0-inch 2.8K (2880 x 1800) OLED display running at up to 120Hz, while the ExpertBook P5 uses a 14.0-inch QHD+ (2560 x 1600) IPS display running at up to 144Hz. That makes the Zenbook’s display a bit sharper and, of course, it has OLED’s usual dynamic colors and inky blacks. The ExpertBook’s display has a faster refresh rate, but that’s not much of an advantage given the relatively slow GPUs on these laptops.
Simply put, the Zenbook’s display has wider colors and much deeper contrast. Oddly, its color accuracy was very poor, but that’s unusual for OLED and is either a physical flaw or could be a software bug. The ExpertBook P5’s display has very good measurements for an IPS panel, but it won’t be nearly as competent for creative work or streaming high dynamic range (HDR) content. It’s much brighter, though, which is good for anyone who needs to work in bright ambient lighting.
Asus Zenbook S 14 (OLED)
Asus ExpertBook P5 (IPS)
Brightness (nits)
313
482
AdobeRGB gamut
100%
99%
sRGB gamut
95%
77%
DCI-P3 gamut
100%
79%
Accuracy (DeltaE, lower is better)
4.92
1.18
Contrast
28,310:1
1,510:1
Portability
Luke Larsen / Digital Trends
The Zenbook S 14 is considerably thinner than the ExpertBook P5, but both are around the same width and depth and the same weight. As with many 14-inch laptops, these two offer a good balance between display size and portability.
More important is their battery life. Intel’s Lunar Lake chipsets are aimed at being more efficient and competitive with the likes of Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X and Apple’s M3 (and soon, M4) chipsets. And it’s here that perhaps the most significant difference exists between the two. The Zenbook is a very long-lasting machine, competing strongly with, say, the MacBook Air M3 in all three of our tests — web browsing, video looping, and running the demanding Cinebench R24 multi-core test. The MacBook only beats the Zenbook in web browsing, by around two hours.
However, the ExpertBook isn’t nearly as long-lasting. It’s only about half as strong in web browsing and falls significantly short in the other two tests. It does have a smaller battery, but not enough to explain these results. And the same with its less power-hungry IPS display.
Web
Video
Cinebench R24
Asus Zenbook S 14 (Core Ultra 7 258V / Intel Arc 140V)
The Zenbook is a much better Lunar Lake representative
These two laptops are among the first to introduce Intel’s new and very important Lunar Lake chipsets. Windows needs a shot in the arm to compete with Apple’s hyper-efficient MacBooks and Qualcomm, which has stepped up. But Qualcomm runs on Windows on Arm, with at least the potential for spotty performance and incompatibility.
Simply put, the Zenbook S 14 is a much better representative of the new chipset’s potential. It’s not terribly fast, but neither is the ExpertBook P5. But it lasts a lot longer on a charge, and it’s a much more attractive laptop overall. The ExpertBook is cheaper, but not so much so that it’s an even match.
